Capacity management and resource allocation for colocation datacenters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Colocation datacenters face challenges with capacity constraints, supply chain disruptions, and lack of automation in resource allocation and demand forecasting, leading to inefficiencies and long lead times in meeting tenant demands.

Innovation Solution

A framework is developed using DCIM software to automate resource allocation by predicting tenant demand through hierarchical forecasting, SLA automation, tenant priority scoring, and optimizing resource configuration and allocation based on available capacity and priority scores.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual resource allocation approach is used, then operational simplicity is maintained, but productivity and response time to tenant demands deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary forecasting of tenant demand using historical data and external factors before actual resource allocation is needed. This advance prediction enables proactive resource provisioning, reducing lead times and improving productivity without requiring complex real-time decision-making systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An automated resource allocation system acts as an intermediary between DCIM software and resource provisioning processes. This intermediary layer orchestrates forecasting, resource matching, and allocation decisions, improving efficiency while managing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If capacity expansion is delayed, then infrastructure cost is reduced, but service reliability and SLA compliance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSLA complianceVSAvoidcapacity planning lead time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The forecasting model predicts future tenant demand by analyzing historical usage patterns and external factors in advance. This preliminary assessment identifies capacity requirements before they become critical, enabling timely capacity expansion that maintains SLA compliance without excessive lead time or unnecessary infrastructure investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors actual tenant usage against forecasted demand and adjusts capacity planning accordingly. This feedback mechanism ensures reliable service by detecting capacity shortfalls early while optimizing infrastructure investment by scaling based on actual demand patterns rather than static projections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If resources are pre-ordered in advance, then productivity and order fulfillment speed improve, but loss of time for resource preparation and potential over-provisioning increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder fulfillment speedVSAvoidresource lead time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-orders resources based on forecasted tenant demand rather than actual orders. By analyzing historical usage patterns and external factors, it anticipates resource requirements and initiates procurement early in the lead time window, enabling faster order fulfillment while avoiding over-provisioning through accurate demand prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The resource allocation system dynamically adjusts pre-ordering decisions based on updated forecasts and actual usage patterns. It continuously re-evaluates resource requirements and modifies pre-order quantities accordingly, optimizing the balance between fulfillment speed and avoiding unnecessary resource preparation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Measurement precision

If hierarchical forecasting is implemented, then measurement precision of demand prediction improves, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemand forecasting accuracyVSAvoidforecasting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The forecasting system divides demand prediction into hierarchical levels (aggregate tenant demand, individual tenant demand, specific resource types). This segmentation allows complex forecasting to be broken down into manageable components, improving measurement precision through detailed analysis while controlling system complexity through modular processing at each level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates external factors (economic indicators, market trends) as additional dimensions in the forecasting model. This multi-dimensional approach improves demand prediction accuracy by capturing influences beyond historical usage patterns, while managing complexity through structured integration of diverse data sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20260037326A1Capacity management and resource allocation for colocation datacenters
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 HITACHI LTD
  • US20260037326A1 patent drawing
  • US20260037326A1 patent drawing
  • US20260037326A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Resource allocation and configuration of equipment in colocation data centers, including predicting hierarchical capacity demand for each of the tenants of the colocation data centers using internal demand signals and external demand signals; determining remaining capacity available for the each of the tenants; determining additional capacity needed for the each of the tenants based on the remaining capacity available and the predicted hierarchical capacity demand of the each of the tenants; generating a recommended configuration for the each of the tenants determined to require additional capacity based on a current configuration of the each of the tenants and the determined additional capacity needed; for the recommended configuration being accepted, while the recommended configuration is being implemented, optimize allocation of resources to the recommended configuration based on tenant priority score function, current allocation, and remaining capacity; and controlling the colocation data centers to allocate the resources according to the optimization.