Datacenter Power Capping with Timed Reactive Enforcement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Datacenters face inefficiencies due to overprovisioning of power, leading to underutilization of capacity and frequent constraints on downstream devices, which can result in wasted resources and poor user experience, while conventional power capping techniques restrict operations and waste power.

Innovation Solution

A power management system that identifies components in a hierarchical power distribution system, monitors power consumption, and dynamically adjusts power caps to allow temporary exceedance until a timer expires, optimizing power usage without risking circuit breaker trips.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If power caps are applied to constrain downstream devices, then power limit violations are avoided, but operations at downstream devices are restricted and power is wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower safetyVSAvoiddevice operations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The power management system dynamically adjusts power cap enforcement based on real-time power consumption monitoring and predictions. Instead of applying static power caps, the system adapts power constraints in response to changing conditions, allowing operations to proceed when safe and preventing violations when risk is detected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors power consumption at multiple levels of the power distribution hierarchy and uses this feedback to adjust power cap enforcement. The monitoring system provides real-time data on power usage, enabling the system to respond to actual conditions rather than relying on predetermined static constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If power is over-provisioned to avoid breaker trips, then power safety is maintained, but power utilization efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower safetyVSAvoidpower waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of power cap enforcement from a static, conservative setting to a dynamic setting that adjusts based on monitored power consumption and predictions. This allows the system to utilize power more efficiently by enforcing constraints only when necessary to prevent violations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of applying full power caps continuously, the system applies partial constraints only when and where needed to prevent breaker trips. This selective enforcement allows downstream devices to operate at full capacity when safe, avoiding unnecessary power waste while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If power caps are enforced frequently, then power limit violations are prevented, but user experience deteriorates due to visible constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower limit complianceVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary monitoring and predictions to anticipate potential power limit violations before they occur. By detecting trends and predicting future power consumption, the system can take preventive action only when necessary, avoiding frequent interruptions to user operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The power management system operates autonomously by monitoring power consumption and automatically adjusting power cap enforcement without requiring user intervention. This self-service approach prevents user-facing constraints while maintaining power safety through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12007734B2Datacenter level power management with reactive power capping
Publication Date: 2024.06.11 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US12007734B2 patent drawing
  • US12007734B2 patent drawing
  • US12007734B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed techniques relate to managing power within a power distribution system. Power consumption corresponding to devices (e.g., servers) that receive power from an upstream device (e.g., a bus bar) may be monitored (e.g., by a service) to determine when power consumption corresponding to those devices breaches (or approaches) a budget threshold corresponding to an amount of power allocated to the upstream device. If the budget threshold is breached, or is likely to be breached, the service may initiate operations to distribute power caps for the devices and to initiate a timer. Although distributed, the power caps may be ignored by the devices until they are instructed to enforce the power caps (e.g., upon expiration of the timer). This allows the power consumption of the devices to exceed the budgeted power associated with the upstream device at least until expiration of the timer while avoiding power outage events.