Dataflow Operator Mapping Analysis for CGRP Execution Inefficiencies

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dataflow computing systems face inefficiencies in executing neural networks and other parallel computing applications due to challenges in mapping operations to hardware resources, particularly in systems utilizing coarse-grain reconfigurable processors (CGRPs), which require optimal allocation and synchronization of computations across multiple processing units and memory elements.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented efficiency analyzer selects operators from a dataflow program's intermediate representation and maps them to hardware resources, computing execution metrics, and identifies inefficiencies, enabling improved resource allocation and synchronization within computing systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If operators are mapped to hardware resources in dataflow computing systems, then computational functionality is achieved, but execution inefficiencies occur due to suboptimal resource allocation and synchronization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution efficiencyVSAvoidexecution time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the dataflow program before execution to identify potential inefficiencies in operator mapping and resource allocation. By analyzing the intermediate representation and predicting execution metrics in advance, the system can optimize the mapping strategy before actual hardware execution occurs, preventing time loss during runtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The efficiency analyzer computes predicted execution metrics based on hardware descriptions and operator mappings, then uses this feedback information to identify inefficiencies and suggest improved mappings. This closed-loop feedback mechanism allows continuous optimization of resource allocation and synchronization strategies based on actual or predicted performance data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Power

If multiple processing units and memory elements are utilized in CGRPs, then computational capacity increases, but resource allocation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational capacityVSAvoidresource allocation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex resource allocation problem into manageable components by analyzing operators individually or in groups and mapping them to specific hardware resources. The efficiency analyzer breaks down the overall mapping task into smaller sub-tasks that can be analyzed and optimized separately, reducing the perceived complexity while maintaining high computational capacity utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The efficiency analyzer acts as an intermediary between the high-level dataflow program and the underlying hardware resources. It translates abstract operator requirements into concrete hardware mapping decisions, managing the complexity of resource allocation automatically without requiring direct manual intervention, thus enabling high computational capacity with reduced allocation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Speed

If operator mapping is optimized for performance, then execution speed improves, but analysis and mapping time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution speedVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial optimization by focusing the efficiency analysis on critical sections or bottlenecks in the dataflow program rather than uniformly optimizing all operators. This selective approach achieves significant execution speed improvements for the most impactful operations while minimizing the total analysis time required, avoiding excessive optimization overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12367022B2Method and system to determine execution inefficiencies in dataflow programs
Publication Date: 2025.07.22 SAMBANOVA SYSTEMS INC
  • US12367022B2 patent drawing
  • US12367022B2 patent drawing
  • US12367022B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method a computer-implemented efficiency analyzer selects operators from an intermediate representation of a dataflow program. The operators are included in a mapping of the operators to hardware of a computing system to execute the dataflow program. Based on the mapping and a description of the hardware, the efficiency analyzer computes an execution metric associated with executing the operators on the hardware. Based on the execution metric and hardware description, the efficiency analyzer determines an inefficiency metric, and based on the inefficiency metric, the efficiency analyzer determines an inefficiency associated with the dataflow program. The computing system to execute the dataflow program can comprise a coarse grain computing system and the hardware can include a reconfigurable processor of the computing system. A computer program product and a computing system to a the dataflow program can implement the method.