Dataset Ranking via Graph-Based Lineage and Composite Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current data discovery methods in data centers rely on simple text searching, which fail to scale with massive data volumes and lack effective ranking mechanisms, leading to overwhelming results and difficulty in identifying relevant datasets.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a dataset rank metric that generates a graph connecting datasets based on data lineage, using weighted composite scores to iteratively rank datasets, considering data quality, reliability, and popularity, to present the most relevant datasets for a given task.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If simple text searching is used to search datasets, then the search process is simple and fast, but the search results become overwhelming and irrelevant when searching large data centers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch process simplicityVSAvoidsearch result relevance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the search problem by introducing a graph structure that divides datasets into nodes and their relationships into edges. This segmentation allows the system to process and rank datasets based on their connections rather than treating all datasets uniformly, thereby improving result relevance while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a graph-based intermediary structure between the user's search query and the actual datasets. This intermediary (the graph with nodes and edges) mediates the search process by filtering and ranking datasets based on their relationships, thus improving result relevance without requiring complex search operations from the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If current data discovery methods focus on isolated metrics for individual datasets, then the ranking process is simple, but the results fail to scale with massive data volumes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveranking process complexityVSAvoidsearch scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple ranking factors into a unified graph-based approach. Instead of treating individual dataset metrics in isolation, the system combines data lineage, quality, reliability, and popularity into an integrated graph structure, enabling scalable ranking that considers relationships between datasets rather than processing them independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a relational dimension to the ranking process by introducing graph edges that represent data lineage and connections between datasets. This dimensional change from isolated metrics to relational structures enables the system to scale effectively by leveraging the graph's hierarchical and interconnected nature rather than processing datasets in isolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Quantity of substance

If thousands of search results are returned for a query, then the search covers comprehensive data, but users cannot identify relevant datasets without effective ranking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of search resultsVSAvoiddataset identification ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different weights and characteristics to different parts of the graph based on their specific properties (e.g., data quality, reliability, popularity). This allows the system to highlight locally optimal datasets in the search results while maintaining comprehensive coverage, making it easier for users to identify relevant datasets among many results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12141154B2Dataset ranking based on composite score
Publication Date: 2024.11.12 INTUIT INC
  • US12141154B2 patent drawing
  • US12141154B2 patent drawing
  • US12141154B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method implements a dataset rank metric for measuring dataset relevance. Metadata is identified for a plurality of datasets. A graph structure is generated in storage. The graph structure includes a multitude of nodes connected by a multitude of edges. Each node of the multitude of nodes representing a respective dataset of a multitude of datasets, the multitude of edges connecting the multitude of nodes according to a data lineage determined from metadata of the multitude of datasets. A composite score is generated for each node of the graph. The computer processor iteratively processes the composite scores for the multitude of nodes of the graph to generate a dataset rank for each dataset. The multitude of datasets is presented in an interface, sorted according to the respective dataset rank of each dataset.