Unique Date Code Marking for Collectible Uniqueness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for marking collectibles fail to effectively increase their uniqueness, leading to a lack of individuality and value in mass-produced items, as they often rely on subjective perceptions of interest, sentiment, or scarcity without a tangible, unique identifier.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that involve creating and randomly selecting unique date codes, combining calendar month and day representations, which can include additional elements like year, symbol, word, or trademark, to be permanently affixed to collectible items, ensuring each item is uniquely marked and distinct from others, even if visually identical.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If mass-produced items are labeled as 'Limited Editions' with consecutive numbers or specific production quantities, then the perceived scarcity and demand increase, but the items remain visually identical and lack true individuality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction quantityVSAvoidindividuality information
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by adding unique date code markings to specific locations on each collectible item. While the items remain visually identical in their overall appearance, each item receives a localized unique identifier (date code) that provides individuality without affecting the mass production process. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining quantity efficiency while adding individuality information through localized marking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of information

If unique identifiers are added to each collectible item to increase individuality, then uniqueness and collectible value improve, but the marking process complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividuality informationVSAvoidmarking process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs preliminary action by pre-generating a comprehensive set of unique date codes representing all possible calendar dates (365 or 366 codes) before the collectible production begins. This pre-prepared code set can be randomly assigned to items during or after production without requiring complex real-time generation systems. This resolves the contradiction by simplifying the marking process complexity while maintaining unique individuality information for each item.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by using date codes that represent calendar dates (month and day combinations) as the unique identifier parameter. This approach provides a systematic way to generate unique identifiers with a manageable parameter space (365-366 possible values). The date code parameter system balances uniqueness requirements with process simplicity, as these codes can be easily generated, stored, and applied without complex equipment or procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If a large number of unique date codes (at least 365) are created and randomly assigned to collectibles produced in a short time period, then each item achieves true uniqueness, but the coordination and management of the marking system become more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniqueness informationVSAvoidmarking system management
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses date codes representing calendar dates as the uniqueness parameter, providing a natural, intuitive, and easily manageable system. With only 365-366 possible date code values, the system maintains true uniqueness while remaining simple to operate and manage. The date parameter system is inherently organized and recognizable, making it easier to handle than arbitrary unique identifiers, thus resolving the contradiction between uniqueness and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies homogeneity by using a uniform date code format (representing calendar months and days) for all collectible items. This consistent marking approach across all items simplifies the management and coordination of the marking system. The homogeneous date code system can be uniformly applied through automated or semi-automated processes, reducing operational complexity while ensuring each item receives a unique identifier from the standardized set.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

Data Source

PatentUS9925821B2Systems and methods for marking collectibles to increase their uniqueness
Publication Date: 2018.03.27 CRYSTALIER
  • US9925821B2 patent drawing
  • US9925821B2 patent drawing
  • US9925821B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an embodiment of the present invention, a method for marking collectible items to increase their collectible uniqueness includes creating a multiplicity of unique date codes, each of the multiplicity of unique date codes including a representation of a calendar month and a representation of a day in the calendar month, randomly selecting one of the multiplicity of unique date codes, and affixing the randomly selected one of the multiplicity of unique date codes to a collectible item. According to other embodiments, a system with a computer and a marking device may apply a date code to a collectible item. According to yet other embodiments, a method for marking collectibles includes creating at least three hundred sixty-five collectibles in a time period shorter than a year, and marking each with a unique date code combination such that no two visually identical collectibles share the same date code.