Closed-Loop DBS Signal Sampling Synchronization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current closed-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems face challenges due to electrical artefacts from stimulation signals, leading to distorted and suboptimal electrophysiological signal measurement, which affects the accuracy of closed-loop control.

Innovation Solution

Synchronizing the generation of stimulation signals with the sampling of electrophysiological signals to occur outside the stimulation pulses, ensuring that sampling happens when artefacts are not present, and selecting a sampling frequency that complies with the Shannon-Whittaker-Kotelnikov sampling theorem to maintain signal integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If electrophysiological signals are sampled at high frequency to capture signal details, then measurement precision is improved, but voltage artefacts from stimulation become extremely large (a million times the signal level)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrophysiological signal measurement precisionVSAvoidvoltage artefact level
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by synchronizing the sampling operation to occur at specific phases of the stimulation pulse cycle. The sampling is timed to happen during the inter-pulse interval when stimulation artefacts are minimal, creating a periodic sampling pattern that avoids the harmful voltage artefacts while maintaining high measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by predicting the timing of stimulation pulses and pre-scheduling sampling operations to occur just before or during the inter-pulse intervals. This allows the system to proactively avoid artefact contamination rather than reacting to it after the fact

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If electrophysiological signals are sampled at low frequency to reduce processing load, then device complexity is reduced, but aliasing occurs leading to elevated noise floor and low signal-to-noise ratio

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling system complexityVSAvoidsignal-to-noise ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the sampling frequency parameter to be synchronized with the stimulation pulse frequency. By setting the sampling frequency as an integer multiple of the stimulation frequency and adjusting the phase relationship, the system achieves optimal signal-to-noise ratio without requiring excessively high sampling rates or complex processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If stimulation and recording occur simultaneously to enable closed-loop control, then response time is improved, but electrical artefacts from stimulation corrupt the electrophysiological signal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosed-loop response timeVSAvoidelectrophysiological signal quality
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses periodic action by implementing synchronized sampling that occurs at regular intervals during the inter-pulse periods. This allows simultaneous stimulation and recording while periodically capturing artefact-free signals that can be used for closed-loop control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuity of useful action by ensuring that sampling occurs continuously during the inter-pulse intervals, capturing electrophysiological signals without interruption while stimulation continues. This enables real-time closed-loop control without requiring separate stimulation and recording phases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12036411B2Measurement of electrophysiological signals during stimulation of a target area of a body
Publication Date: 2024.07.16 OXFORD UNIVERSITY INNOVATION LTD
  • US12036411B2 patent drawing
  • US12036411B2 patent drawing
  • US12036411B2 patent drawing

AI summary

When generating a stimulation signal comprising stimulation pulses delivered to a target area of a human or animal body, an electrophysiological signal measured from the body for closed-loop control of the stimulation signal, is sampled, at a sampling frequency in an analogue-to-digital converter for deriving a feedback signal for closed-loop control of the stimulation signal. The generation of the stimulation signal and the sampling of the electrophysiological signal are synchronised and have a relative phase selected to cause the sampling to occur outside the stimulation pulses, which prevents the effect of the stimulation pulses from interfering with the digital electrophysiological signal, whiles allowing maintenance of Nyquist-Shannon rules and the integrity of the discrete Laplace transform (z-transform) required in discrete control theory.