DBS Probe Trajectory Selection Using Electrophysiology Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapies are limited by the reliance on anatomical structures like the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for trajectory selection, failing to capture all electrophysiological indicators of neurological conditions, necessitating a method for selecting effective trajectories independent of such structures.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing microelectrodes to gather electrophysiology data along multiple brain trajectories, correlating it with clinically-determined tissue activation volumes from previous successful treatments, to generate a score for selecting the optimal trajectory for stimulation probe insertion based on neural activity patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If trajectory selection is constrained within anatomical structures like the subthalamic nucleus (STN), then the procedure follows traditional anatomical guidance, but it fails to capture all electrophysiological indicators of neurological conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrophysiological indicator captureVSAvoidtrajectory selection flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the selection criteria from purely anatomical parameters (STN boundaries) to electrophysiological parameters (neural activity patterns, LFP signals). By measuring and analyzing electrical activity along multiple trajectories, the system identifies optimal paths based on physiological response rather than fixed anatomical constraints, thereby capturing all electrophysiological indicators while maintaining procedural guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple trajectories are evaluated using electrophysiology data and algorithms, then the optimal trajectory can be selected for improved treatment outcomes, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary electrophysiological measurements and algorithmic scoring along multiple candidate trajectories before the actual treatment trajectory is selected. By extending microelectrodes along several paths and evaluating their electrophysiological characteristics in advance, the system identifies the optimal trajectory beforehand, ensuring treatment effectiveness while managing complexity through structured pre-planning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary computational layer that processes electrophysiological data and generates trajectory scores. The algorithm acts as a mediator between raw neural signals and clinical decision-making, translating complex electrophysiological measurements into actionable trajectory recommendations, thereby managing system complexity through structured data processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If electrophysiology data is collected at multiple increments along each trajectory, then accurate neural activity measurement is achieved, but the time and resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneural activity measurement accuracyVSAvoiddata collection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system collects electrophysiological data at multiple increments along each trajectory, using more measurement points than the minimum single-point approach. This excessive sampling ensures accurate characterization of neural activity patterns along the entire trajectory path, capturing variations in electrical activity that would be missed with fewer measurements, thereby achieving high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP4313265B1System to select among trajectories for therapeutic stimulation of a target volume region within the brain
Publication Date: 2025.11.12 THE RGT UNIV OF MICHIGAN
  • EP4313265B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4313265B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4313265B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system and method for selecting a trajectory within the brain for placement of a stimulation probe for deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatment of an individual afflicted with an illness, condition, or disorder. Electrophysiological data attained within the brain of the individual is utilized with clinically determined regions of stimulation (for example, volume of tissue activated (VTA)) of other similarly-afflicted individuals having a positive operative outcome to assign an objective score, independent of anatomical structure (for example, not constrained within the subthalamic nucleus (STN)) to facilitate selection among prospective trajectories for placement of the stimulation probe during DBS.