Deep Brain Stimulation Coupling Matrix for Impedance Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining stimulation settings for deep brain stimulation probes require imaging devices and indirect estimation of electrical conductivity, which is impractical for updating due to tissue changes over time and limited resolution.

Innovation Solution

A method involving sequential application of test currents to stimulation electrodes, measuring excitation voltages, and deriving a coupling matrix to determine the relation between stimulation settings and the corresponding electrical field in brain tissue, eliminating the need for imaging devices and providing accurate, detailed electrical property measurements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If MRI/DTI imaging devices are used to obtain conductivity maps, then electrical conductivity information can be obtained, but the method becomes impractical for regular updates due to tissue changes over time and has limited resolution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical conductivity measurementVSAvoidimaging device requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential measurement function from complex MRI/DTI imaging devices and implements it using simple electrical impedance measurements through the stimulation electrodes themselves. By measuring impedance between electrode pairs, the system obtains electrical conductivity information without requiring external imaging equipment, thus eliminating device complexity while maintaining measurement capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The DBS stimulation system performs its own electrical property measurements using its existing electrodes and control circuitry. The stimulation device sequentially applies test currents and measures resulting voltages to derive tissue electrical properties, eliminating the need for separate imaging devices and enabling self-updating of conductivity maps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If DTI scanning is performed regularly to update conductivity maps, then tissue changes can be tracked, but the procedure becomes unpractical due to time consumption and patient burden

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconductivity map accuracy over timeVSAvoidscanning time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables continuous monitoring of electrical properties by performing impedance measurements during routine stimulation periods. Instead of requiring periodic DTI scans, the stimulation device continuously or frequently measures tissue electrical properties using the same electrodes, maintaining up-to-date conductivity information without interrupting patient care or requiring additional scanning time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by using measured impedance values to update the electrical conductivity map, which then informs optimization of stimulation settings. This closed-loop approach ensures the conductivity map remains accurate over time by continuously incorporating new measurement data, eliminating the need for time-consuming periodic re-scanning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If DTI resolution is limited to about 2 mm, then scanning time can be kept practical, but the resolution is 4 times the typical electrode pitch and insufficient for high resolution DBS probes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial resolutionVSAvoidmeasurement efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making measurements at multiple discrete electrode locations along the probe. By sequentially activating different electrode pairs and measuring local impedance values, the system obtains high-resolution electrical property data at each electrode site, matching the spatial distribution of the DBS electrodes themselves rather than using coarse whole-brain imaging

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of manufacture

If sequential test current application and voltage measurement is performed, then detailed electrical property information can be obtained without imaging devices, but multiple measurements are required to build the coupling matrix

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of measurement systemVSAvoidmeasurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary characterization measurements during the initial implant procedure or a dedicated calibration session. By completing the full set of impedance measurements and building the coupling matrix upfront, the electrical properties are established before clinical use begins, minimizing the impact of measurement time on ongoing patient treatment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements periodic updating of the coupling matrix by repeating impedance measurements at scheduled intervals or when changes in stimulation response are detected. This approach balances the need for accurate electrical property data with clinical time constraints by updating measurements only when necessary rather than continuously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables more practical and accurate determination of stimulation settings without imaging devices, allowing for easier updates due to tissue changes and providing detailed information on electrical properties close to each electrode, improving the precision of stimulation settings and expected V-fields.

Implementation Method 1

measuring a resulting excitation voltage at m stimulation electrodes... deriving an (m*n) coupling matrix, an element Zq,p in the coupling matrix reflecting an amount of electrical impedance between two of the stimulation electrodes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical impedance: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS11524162B2Method and system for determining settings for deep brain stimulation
Publication Date: 2022.12.13 NEURONEXUS TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11524162B2 patent drawing
  • US11524162B2 patent drawing
  • US11524162B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system are provided for determining a relation between stimulation settings for a brain stimulation probe and a corresponding V-field. The brain stimulation probe comprises multiple stimulation electrodes. The V-field is an electrical field in brain tissue surrounding the stimulation electrodes. The method comprises sequentially applying a test current to n stimulation electrodes, n being a number between 2 and the number of stimulation electrodes of the brain stimulation probe, for each test current at one of the n stimulation electrodes, measuring a resulting excitation voltage at m stimulation electrodes, m being a number between 2 and the number of stimulation electrodes of the brain stimulation probe, from the stimulation settings and the measured excitation voltages, deriving a coupling matrix, an element in the coupling matrix reflecting an amount of electrical impedance between two of the stimulation electrodes, and using the coupling matrix for determining the relation between the stimulation settings and the corresponding V-field.