DBU Synthesis via Safer Catalysts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The industrial production of 1,8-Diazabicyclo-[5.4.0]-undec-7-ene (DBU) currently relies on pyrophoric Raney catalysts and anhydrous ammonia, which are hazardous and complex to handle, leading to increased costs and regulatory challenges.

Innovation Solution

A process is developed to produce DBU from ε-caprolactam and acrylonitrile without using Raney catalysts or anhydrous ammonia, involving the steps of addition, reduction in the presence of metal catalysts like Iron, Cobalt, or noble metals, and dehydration, with a single final purification step, allowing for continuous operation and reduced complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If Raney catalysts and anhydrous ammonia are used in the hydrogenation step, then the hydrogenation reaction can proceed effectively, but the process becomes hazardous and complex due to pyrophoric catalysts and toxic gas handling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogenation reaction effectivenessVSAvoidsafety hazards from pyrophoric catalysts and toxic ammonia
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the hazardous components (Raney catalysts and anhydrous ammonia) from the hydrogenation process, replacing them with safer alternatives that maintain reaction effectiveness while eliminating pyrophoric and toxic hazards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs alternative catalysts that are safer and easier to handle than Raney catalysts, accepting potentially lower catalyst longevity or activity in exchange for dramatically improved safety and operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple purification steps are implemented to ensure high product purity, then the quality of DBU is improved, but the process complexity and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDBU product purityVSAvoidnumber of purification steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by optimizing the hydrogenation and dehydration steps to minimize impurity formation from the start, allowing a single final purification step to suffice rather than requiring multiple sequential purification operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes process parameters (catalyst type, reaction conditions, temperature, pressure) to optimize product selectivity and minimize byproduct formation, thereby reducing the burden on downstream purification operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If traditional three-step process with intermediate purifications is used, then each step can be optimized independently, but the overall process time and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol over each reaction stepVSAvoidtotal process time including intermediate purifications
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the hydrogenation and dehydration steps into a continuous one-pot process, eliminating the need for intermediate isolation and purification operations while maintaining control over both transformations through optimized reaction conditions and catalyst selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous operation where the product of one step immediately becomes the substrate for the next step without interruption for purification, maintaining continuous useful action throughout the synthesis sequence and dramatically reducing total process time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process eliminates the risks associated with pyrophoric catalysts and toxic ammonia, achieving high yields and purity of DBU with simplified process operations and reduced costs.

Implementation Method 1

reduction by reaction with hydrogen in the presence of a catalyst based on metals of groups 8, 9 and 10 of the periodic table

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

subjecting said amine to dehydration in the presence of an acid catalyst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS20240158407A1Method for preparation of amidines
Publication Date: 2024.05.16 VERSALIS SPA
  • US20240158407A1 patent drawing
  • US20240158407A1 patent drawing
  • US20240158407A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for the preparation of amidines or their derivatives, includes the following stepsynthesis of nitrile lactams by reaction between a lactam and an α-β unsaturated nitrile;synthesis of N-(aminoalkyl) lactams by reducing the nitrile lactams;and synthesis of amidines by dehydrating the N-(aminoalkyl) lactams.