Impedance-Based DC Fault Power Interruption for Touch Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As power levels in applications like Power over Ethernet (PoE) and Power and Fiber Cable (PFC) increase, there is a need to ensure that the amount of energy provided into a fault is limited to prevent electrical shocks and fires, particularly in scenarios involving human body contact with power cables.

Innovation Solution

A fault managed power system that includes an upstream low-pass filter, an impedance sensor tank circuit, and electronic switches to detect and interrupt electrical energy supply upon detecting a fault, such as human body contact, using impedance sensors and filters to isolate the power cable from noise and signals, and employing electronic switches to rapidly turn off the energy supply.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If power levels are increased in PoE and PFC applications, then power delivery capability is improved, but the risk of electrical shock and energy delivered into faults increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower delivery capabilityVSAvoidelectrical shock risk
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary fault detection by monitoring cable impedance before full power is delivered. The controller detects faults in advance and prevents power delivery to faulty cables, thereby maintaining high power capability while preventing electrical shock hazards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors cable impedance and provides feedback to the controller. When a fault is detected through impedance changes, the controller responds by interrupting power delivery, creating a closed-loop safety mechanism that enables high power operation without increasing shock risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If fault detection and interruption mechanisms are added, then safety is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The impedance monitoring mechanism serves multiple functions: it characterizes cable conditions for power delivery decisions, detects faults for safety interruption, and provides diagnostic information. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate safety components, thereby improving safety while limiting complexity increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the existing power cable and controller to perform self-diagnosis through impedance monitoring. The controller itself detects faults and triggers interruptions without requiring external safety devices, enabling high reliability with minimal added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If impedance monitoring is performed continuously, then fault detection accuracy is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs impedance monitoring periodically at key moments: during cable characterization before power delivery, and when faults are suspected. This periodic monitoring maintains high fault detection accuracy while avoiding continuous monitoring energy overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies excessive monitoring only when necessary (during fault conditions or characterization phases) and uses minimal or no monitoring during normal operation. This partial action approach maintains detection accuracy when needed while minimizing overall energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides enhanced shock and fire safety by rapidly interrupting energy supply upon detecting faults, allowing for efficient power delivery with touch-safe levels and reducing electromagnetic interference, while supporting higher power levels than traditional standards.

Implementation Method 1

an upstream low-pass filter, connected between an electrical power supply and the power cable, for isolating the power cable from upstream noise or signals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLow-pass filtering: Filter (electronic)

Implementation Method 2

The downstream component(s) can include a downstream low-pass filter for isolating the power cable from downstream noise or signals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLow-pass filtering: Filter (electronic)

Implementation Method 3

a sensor including an impedance sensor tank circuit for measuring electrical activity related to the electrical pulses on the power cable

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpedance sensing: Electrical Impedance Tomography

Implementation Method 4

The sensor can include an impedance sensor with an RC component, and a pi-filter with an LC component. A capacitor in the impedance sensor and inductor in the pi-filter can form the tank circuit to amplify a fault signal on the cable

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTank circuit resonance: Resonance

Data Source

PatentUS12609528B2DC fault managed power system
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA INC
  • US12609528B2 patent drawing
  • US12609528B2 patent drawing
  • US12609528B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method and system are provided to calibrate detection of condition(s) on an electrical system with a source circuit. The method and system involve measuring using a sensor reference voltages across the source circuit to be supplied downstream in the open circuit state at a first system voltage for calibration; and measuring using the sensor a voltage in the open circuit state when a second system voltage is applied to the source circuit. The method and system further scales a reference voltage from the reference voltages according to a ratio between first and second system voltages; calculates a difference between the scaled reference voltage and a current voltage measured by the sensor; calculates a voltage change over time between prior and current voltages; compares the difference and the voltage change over time to respective thresholds; and in response to the comparison, determines whether a condition on the electrical system has occurred.