DC Switching Apparatus Arc Extinction via Semiconductor Commutation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing DC switching devices face challenges in efficiently extinguishing electric arcs at low currents, leading to prolonged arcing times and increased wear on contacts, especially when traditional mechanical switches struggle to build up sufficient voltage for arc extinguishment.

Innovation Solution

A DC switching apparatus that commutes the full current flow from the nominal path to a secondary path, utilizing a semiconductor device to extinguish the arc only when the mechanical switching device fails to do so, thereby preventing semiconductor exposure to high currents and optimizing arc extinguishment at low current levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional mechanical switches are used to extinguish electric arcs at low currents, then the mechanical structure is simple and cost-effective, but the arcing time is prolonged and contact wear increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidcontact endurance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A semiconductor device is introduced as an intermediary component to assist the mechanical switch in extinguishing electric arcs. The semiconductor device activates to provide a low-impedance path that rapidly commutes current away from the arc, enabling faster arc extinction without requiring the mechanical switch to handle the full arc extinction burden alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the electrical parameters (impedance, current path) dynamically by switching between mechanical and semiconductor components. The semiconductor device changes the circuit impedance from high (mechanical switch only) to low (semiconductor assisted), enabling rapid current commutation and arc extinction that adapts to different current levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If semiconductor devices are used to extinguish arcs at all current levels, then arc extinction is efficient at low currents, but the semiconductor is exposed to high currents causing damage risk and increased cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearc extinction efficiencyVSAvoidsemiconductor protection requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The semiconductor device performs partial action by assisting arc extinction only when needed (at low currents where mechanical switches fail). It does not need to handle the full range of current levels, reducing its exposure to damaging high currents while still providing the necessary assistance for efficient arc extinction at critical low current levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical switch performs preliminary action by handling high current interruption first. Only after the mechanical switch has reduced the current to lower levels does the semiconductor device activate to complete the arc extinction process, ensuring the semiconductor is never exposed to the full brunt of high fault currents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If permanent magnets are added to strengthen the magnetic field for arc movement, then arc extinguishment improves at low currents, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearc extinguishment capabilityVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention substitutes the mechanical/permanent magnet-based magnetic field system with an electronic/semiconductor-based current commutation system. Instead of using permanent magnets to create magnetic fields for arc movement, the semiconductor device electronically controls current paths to achieve arc extinction, eliminating the need for additional magnetic components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If the semiconductor device commutes full current flow, then arc extinction is achieved, but the semiconductor is exposed to high currents that may damage it

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearc extinguishmentVSAvoidsemiconductor durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical switch performs preliminary current interruption, reducing the current to lower levels before the semiconductor device activates. This preliminary action ensures that when the semiconductor device commutes the remaining current, it is exposed only to reduced current levels that do not threaten its durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The semiconductor device performs partial current commutation only for the portion of current that remains after mechanical switch operation. It does not need to handle the full fault current, exposing it only to the residual current portion that is safe for semiconductor operation while still achieving complete arc extinction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively extinguishes electric arcs at low currents, reducing contact wear and enabling efficient switching operations, even at low current levels where traditional mechanical switches fail, while using cost-effective semiconductor devices and avoiding the need for additional components like permanent magnets.

Implementation Method 1

an electric arc can ignite between the fixed contact (11) and the movable contact (12) when the movable contact (12) starts separating from the fixed contact (11)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric Arc: Electric Arc

Implementation Method 2

this is usually done by exploiting a magnetic field generating a Lorentz force on the arc column

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLorentz Force: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentEP2801994B1DC current switching apparatus, electronic device, and method for switching an associated DC circuit
Publication Date: 2019.02.20 ABB SPA
  • EP2801994B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2801994B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2801994B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A direct current (DC) switching apparatus comprising: - at least a first mechanical switching device which is suitable to be positioned along an operating path of an associated DC circuit and comprises a fixed contact and a corresponding movable contact which can be actuated between a closed position where they are coupled to each other and current flows along the operating path, to an open position where they are separated from each other so as to interrupt the flow of current along the operating path, wherein an electric arc can ignite between the contacts under separation. The apparatus further comprises electronic means comprising a semiconductor device which is suitable to be positioned along a secondary path and connected in parallel with the first mechanical switching device. The electronic means are configured to allow commuting the flow of current from the operating path to the secondary path and extinguishing through the semiconductor device an electric arc ignited when the movable contact separates from the fixed contact when the first mechanical switching device fails to extinguish it.