DCAP Data Completeness Analysis for Chronic Illness Records

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current healthcare systems lack effective mechanisms to ensure the completeness, validity, and consistency of patient record data across various health care platforms, leading to disparities in care and inadequate management of chronic conditions, particularly in identifying and addressing underlying systemic issues contributing to health care disparities.

Innovation Solution

A method and system, known as the Data Completeness Analysis Package (DCAP), which evaluates the strength and completeness of patient record data by assigning relative importance weights to data fields, generating record strength scores, and performing statistical analyses to identify incompleteness and temporal inconsistencies, thereby providing a centralized tool for managing health care patient record data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If electronic records of patient information are stored in health care databases, then data accessibility and record-keeping efficiency are improved, but data completeness and validity cannot be ensured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecord-keeping efficiencyVSAvoiddata completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring patient record data and generating alerts when completeness or validity thresholds are not met. The feedback loop includes: (1) real-time validation of incoming data against predefined criteria, (2) generation of completeness scores and validity assessments, (3) notification of deficiencies to healthcare providers, and (4) tracking of corrections until standards are satisfied. This closed-loop feedback system ensures that productivity gains from electronic records do not compromise data reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary validation and assessment actions before data is fully integrated into the database. This includes: (1) pre-admission data completeness checks, (2) preliminary validity assessments of diagnostic codes and treatment records, (3) proactive identification of missing information requirements, and (4) advance notification to providers of data gaps. By performing these actions beforehand, the system prevents incomplete or invalid data from compromising the overall database reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple health care software database packages are used across different health care centers, then system adaptability and platform flexibility are improved, but data consistency and comparison capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplatform flexibilityVSAvoiddata consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs universal data validation and assessment mechanisms that function across multiple health care software platforms and database packages. Key universal features include: (1) platform-agnostic data completeness scoring algorithms, (2) cross-platform validity assessment protocols, (3) standardized data element mapping that works with different database structures, and (4) consistent validation rules that apply regardless of the underlying software system. This universality enables data consistency and comparability across diverse health care information systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts validation parameters and assessment criteria based on the specific health care platform and database package being used. This includes: (1) adapting data completeness thresholds to match platform-specific requirements, (2) modifying validity rules according to platform capabilities, (3) adjusting data mapping parameters to accommodate different database structures, and (4) scaling validation stringency based on the criticality of specific data elements. These parameter changes maintain data consistency across platforms while preserving adaptability to diverse systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If comprehensive patient record data collection is implemented, then data completeness is improved, but identification of systemic issues contributing to health care disparities becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata completenessVSAvoiddisparity analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments comprehensive patient record data into distinct analytical layers that facilitate disparity detection. This segmentation includes: (1) demographic characteristic grouping (race, ethnicity, gender, age, socioeconomic status), (2) data completeness scoring by demographic segment, (3) validity assessment by population group, and (4) disparity metric calculation for each segment. By organizing complete data in this segmented manner, the system makes it easier to identify patterns and systemic issues across different populations without being overwhelmed by the complexity of the full dataset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary analytical tools and metrics that bridge comprehensive data collection and disparity identification. These intermediaries include: (1) standardized disparity indicators that translate raw data into meaningful comparisons, (2) intermediate validation scores that highlight potential disparity sources, (3) mediating analytics that control for confounding variables, and (4) intermediary reporting mechanisms that present disparity findings in actionable formats. These intermediaries simplify the path from complete data to actionable disparity insights.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11887707B2Method and system for managing chronic illness health care records
Publication Date: 2024.01.30 UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • US11887707B2 patent drawing
  • US11887707B2 patent drawing
  • US11887707B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for managing health care patient record data including identifying and conveying recordation and temporal inconsistencies in health care patient data pertaining to chronic illnesses. An embodiment of the present invention includes identifying a first health care encounter date on which a chronic illness is recorded in a patient's digital health care data and determining if the chronic illness was recorded in the patient's digital health care data for each subsequent health care encounter. Some embodiments also identify the stage of the chronic illness at each encounter to determine if and how the condition of the chronic illness has changed. Some embodiments generate alerts to inform users when a preexisting chronic illness is not subsequently identified and/or if the subsequent diagnosis of the chronic illness indicates that the condition of the chronic illness has changed by some predetermined amount.