DC/DC Converter Mode Switching for Wide Input Voltage Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional DC/DC converters face issues with large volume, high cost, and reduced efficiency due to the need for two-stage conversion circuits and additional components, which require restarting when input voltage changes, leading to unstable output voltage and increased power loss.

Innovation Solution

A DC/DC converter with a switching circuit that can dynamically switch between full-bridge and half-bridge modes, using an asymmetric half-bridge circuit topology and controlled duty cycles to maintain stable operation, reducing the need for additional components and minimizing power loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If two-stage conversion circuits are used to achieve wide input voltage range, then the voltage range is improved, but the volume and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput voltage rangeVSAvoidconverter volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamic mode switching between full-bridge and half-bridge configurations based on real-time input voltage detection. The controller dynamically adjusts the switching pattern of bridge arms, enabling the converter to adapt to wide input voltage ranges (e.g., 100V-380V) without physical reconfiguration, thereby achieving versatility without increasing volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes a single bridge circuit perform multiple functions by switching between full-bridge mode (for high voltage input) and half-bridge mode (for low voltage input). This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate two-stage conversion circuits, reducing both volume and cost while maintaining wide input voltage adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If two-stage conversion circuits are used to achieve wide input voltage range, then the voltage range is improved, but the cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput voltage rangeVSAvoidconverter cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes a single bridge circuit perform multiple functions by switching between full-bridge mode (for high voltage input) and half-bridge mode (for low voltage input). This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate two-stage conversion circuits, reducing both volume and cost while maintaining wide input voltage adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If the operation mode is fixed and cannot be dynamically switched, then the device complexity is reduced, but the output voltage stability deteriorates when input voltage changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation mode switching complexityVSAvoidoutput voltage stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic mode switching where the controller continuously monitors input voltage and automatically transitions between full-bridge and half-bridge modes. This dynamic adaptation maintains optimal conversion ratios across varying input conditions, ensuring output voltage stability without requiring complex manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback control where the controller detects input voltage changes and adjusts the switching mode accordingly. The feedback mechanism ensures that the converter automatically compensates for input voltage variations, maintaining stable output voltage while managing the complexity through intelligent control algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If additional switching elements and voltage-divider capacitors are added to achieve symmetric half-bridge topology, then the circuit functionality is improved, but the volume and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehalf-bridge mode functionalityVSAvoidconverter volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetric half-bridge topology where the two bridge arms have unequal configurations. One arm operates with active switching elements while the other arm uses passive components or simplified switching. This asymmetric design achieves the necessary half-bridge functionality without requiring additional symmetric components, thereby reducing volume and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

5Adaptability or versatility

If additional switching elements are added to achieve symmetric half-bridge topology, then the circuit functionality is improved, but the power loss increases and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehalf-bridge mode functionalityVSAvoidpower loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetric half-bridge topology where the two bridge arms have unequal configurations. One arm operates with active switching elements while the other arm uses passive components or simplified switching. This asymmetric design achieves the necessary half-bridge functionality without requiring additional symmetric components, thereby reducing volume and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts or removes unnecessary switching elements from the traditional symmetric half-bridge configuration. By eliminating redundant components that contribute to power loss, the patent achieves half-bridge functionality with reduced component count, lower power consumption, and improved efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

6Adaptability or versatility

If the converter is disabled and restarted when input voltage changes, then the operation mode can be adjusted, but the productivity and response time deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation mode adaptationVSAvoidresponse time to voltage changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic mode switching where the controller continuously monitors input voltage and automatically transitions between full-bridge and half-bridge modes. This dynamic adaptation maintains optimal conversion ratios across varying input conditions, ensuring output voltage stability without requiring complex manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent ensures continuous operation without disabling or restarting the converter when input voltage changes. The seamless transition between operating modes maintains uninterrupted power conversion, improving productivity and response time while adapting to varying input conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves a smaller volume, lower cost, and higher efficiency by allowing seamless voltage range adaptation without restarting, reducing transformer saturation risks and power loss, and stabilizing output voltage.

Implementation Method 1

a transformer T1 having a primary winding Np and a secondary winding Ns

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS12580489B2DC/DC converter and control method thereof
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 DELTA ELECTRONICS (SHANGHAI) CO LTD
  • US12580489B2 patent drawing
  • US12580489B2 patent drawing
  • US12580489B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A DC/DC converter includes a switching circuit and a capacitor. The switching circuit includes a first bridge arm and a second bridge arm connected in parallel. The first bridge arm includes a first switch and a second switch. The second bridge arm includes a third switch and a fourth switch. The capacitor is electrically connected with a node between the first switch and the second switch. While the switching circuit is switched from a half-bridge mode to a full-bridge mode, the duty cycle of the control signal for controlling the fourth switch is gradually decreased from 100% to be synchronized with the duty cycle of the control signal for controlling the first switch. Then, the duty cycle of the control signal for controlling the third switch is gradually increased from zero to be synchronized with the duty cycle of the control signal for controlling the second switch.