De Bruijn Waveguide Switching for Photon Synchronization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing photonic circuits face challenges in synchronizing signal pulses propagating through different waveguides to ensure they arrive concurrently at a specific location within the circuit, requiring complex reconfigurable switch arrays and large numbers of switches.

Innovation Solution

Implementing temporal and spatial multiplexing circuits using a set of waveguides arranged according to a de Bruijn sequence, coupled with cyclic switches to deliver unsynchronized signal pulses into contiguous groups of delay waveguides or mode-swap waveguides, allowing for variable relative delay and spatial rearrangement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If reconfigurable switch arrays are used to synchronize signal pulses, then synchronization capability is improved, but device complexity increases due to large numbers of switches required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization capabilityVSAvoidnumber of switches
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the synchronization function into multiple independent delay lines with fixed delay values. Instead of using a single large reconfigurable switch array, the system divides the signal path into multiple segments (delay lines), each with a predetermined delay. This segmentation allows synchronization to be achieved by selectively activating specific segments rather than reconfiguring a complete switch array, thereby reducing the number of switches required while maintaining synchronization capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-configuring multiple delay lines with fixed, predetermined delay values before operation. These delay lines are prepared in advance with specific delay characteristics, allowing the system to achieve synchronization by simply selecting and activating the appropriate pre-configured delay line rather than dynamically reconfiguring switches during operation. This eliminates the need for complex real-time switch control while maintaining flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If reconfigurable switch arrays are used for temporal multiplexing, then temporal flexibility is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemporal flexibilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The temporal multiplexing function is segmented into multiple independent delay lines, each with a fixed delay value. This segmentation transforms the manufacturing challenge of building a large reconfigurable switch array into the simpler task of fabricating multiple independent delay line structures with predetermined delay characteristics. Each delay line can be manufactured as a separate, standardized component, reducing overall manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from dynamic parameter adjustment (reconfigurable switches) to static parameter variation (fixed delay lines with different delay values). By manufacturing delay lines with predetermined, fixed delay parameters rather than building a system that dynamically changes parameters through reconfiguration, the manufacturing process becomes simpler while still providing temporal flexibility through the selection of appropriate fixed-delay components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If a large number of switches are used in switch networks, then synchronization precision is improved, but loss of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization precisionVSAvoidenergy loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the delay function from the switch network, separating the timing adjustment function into independent delay lines. This extraction eliminates the need for multiple switches to achieve synchronization, as the delay lines provide the necessary timing precision passively through their physical path lengths. The switch network is reduced to a minimal control function for selecting among delay lines, rather than using switches to actively adjust timing, thereby reducing energy loss associated with switch operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP4232857B1De bruijn switch
Publication Date: 2026.03.04 PSIQUANTUM CORP
  • EP4232857B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2B
  • EP4232857B1 patent drawingFigure 3A
  • EP4232857B1 patent drawingFigure 3B

AI summary

A temporal multiplexing circuit can include a set of waveguides having different delay lengths, with the waveguides arranged according to a de Bruijn sequence. The set of waveguides can be coupled to a cyclic switch that selectably delivers a group of unsynchronized photons (or other signal pulses) from a contiguous group of input paths into a contiguous group of the delay waveguides. Similarly, a spatial multiplexing circuit can include a set of pairs of waveguides that each implement mode swapping of photons, with different swap distances, with the pairs of waveguides arranged according to a de Bruijn sequence. The set of waveguides can be coupled to a cyclic switch that selectably delivers a group of photons from a set of input paths into a contiguous group of the mode-swap waveguides. Temporal and spatial multiplexing can be combined in a switching network.