Deadbeam Rear Suspension Layout for BEV Off-Road NVH Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The transition to battery electric vehicles (BEVs) necessitates innovative suspension designs that balance off-road performance with noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH) reduction, as traditional suspension systems are compromised by the placement of heavy batteries, leading to suboptimal ramp travel index (RTI) and potential sacrifices in off-road capability.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle suspension system incorporating a deadbeam with an electric drive unit mounted to the vehicle body, coupled with a solid axle and link arms, and a lateral link, which maintains off-road performance while reducing NVH through independent rear suspension, allowing for unique space and structural adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional leaf springs and live rear axles are used for rear suspension, then structural simplicity and ease of manufacture are improved, but off-road performance and ramp travel index deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidoff-road performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The solid rear axle is segmented into a deadbeam structure with separate suspension assemblies for each wheel, allowing independent wheel movement while maintaining axle integrity. This segmentation enables improved off-road performance through individual wheel ramp travel while preserving manufacturing simplicity through modular assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The suspension system transitions from a rigid live axle to a dynamic deadbeam configuration where each wheel can move independently through controlled articulation points. This dynamic capability allows the system to adapt to varying off-road conditions while maintaining structural simplicity through standardized linkages and assemblies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Use of energy by moving object

If heavy batteries are placed in the vehicle for BEV configuration, then electric propulsion capability is improved, but suspension performance and ramp travel index deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectric propulsion capabilityVSAvoidsuspension performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The deadbeam suspension system adds a new dimension of articulation freedom to the vehicle platform, allowing the heavy battery-pack-mounted vehicle body to maintain excellent suspension performance. The multi-linkage configuration creates additional degrees of freedom that compensate for the weight and rigidity constraints imposed by BEV battery placement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If independent rear suspension is implemented to reduce NVH, then noise vibration and harshness are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNVHVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The deadbeam suspension assembly serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides independent wheel movement for NVH reduction, maintains structural integrity for off-road performance, and enables controlled articulation for ramp travel. This multi-functionality reduces overall device complexity by consolidating what would otherwise require separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If deadbeam with solid axle is used to maintain off-road performance, then ramp travel index is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveramp travel indexVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the deadbeam structure with solid axle functionality and independent suspension assemblies into a unified system. This consolidation achieves high ramp travel index and off-road performance while managing device complexity through integrated design rather than separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12109865B2Deadbeam based rear suspension system for BEV driven axle
Publication Date: 2024.10.08 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US12109865B2 patent drawing
  • US12109865B2 patent drawing
  • US12109865B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle suspension system may include a deadbeam extended between a first wheel at a first end of the deadbeam and a second wheel at a second end of the deadbeam, an electric motor disposed forward of the deadbeam, a lateral link operably coupling the deadbeam to a chassis of the vehicle, a first half shaft operably coupled to the first wheel and the electric motor, a second half shaft operably coupled to the second wheel and the electric motor, a first suspension assembly operably coupling the first wheel to the chassis, and a second suspension assembly operably coupling the second wheel to the chassis.