Roof Window Deadbolt Socket Assembly Break-in Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing roof window deadbolt socket assemblies, particularly those made of plastic, lack sufficient break-in resistance due to low mechanical strength, and known solutions like metal braces can be ineffective if the plastic components bend, allowing the deadbolt to be pulled out using a crowbar or similar tools.

Innovation Solution

A deadbolt socket assembly with a reinforced structure, featuring a brace made of higher mechanical strength material, connected to the deadbolt socket with a kinematic connection that allows limited rotational movement around a fixed axis, preventing the deadbolt from being pulled out by generating a turning moment when excessive force is applied, and utilizing a quasi-rotary kinematic pair for enhanced security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a plastic deadbolt socket is used, then aesthetic appearance is improved, but break-in resistance deteriorates due to low mechanical strength

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaesthetic appearanceVSAvoidbreak-in resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The deadbolt socket assembly combines a plastic deadbolt socket with a metal brace supporting element. The plastic socket provides aesthetic appearance while the metal brace provides high mechanical strength and break-in resistance, creating a composite structure that resolves the contradiction between appearance and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If a metal brace is added to reinforce the deadbolt socket, then break-in resistance is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebreak-in resistanceVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The metal brace is integrated with the plastic deadbolt socket through connection elements such as screws, rivets, or press-fit mechanisms. This merging of components creates a unified assembly where the brace reinforces the socket without requiring separate mounting structures, thereby reducing overall device complexity while maintaining high break-in resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Stability of the object's composition

If the brace is fixed rigidly to the frame, then structural stability is improved, but the ability to resist bending forces deteriorates when plastic components bend

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidprotection effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The connection between the brace and deadbolt socket allows for controlled movement or deformation when bending forces are applied. This dynamic response enables the assembly to absorb and dissipate bending forces without compromising the overall structural stability or the effectiveness of the deadbolt engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of manufacture

If additional fixing elements like dovetails or horns are added, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but break-in resistance remains low due to plastic material limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidbreak-in resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of relying solely on plastic fixing elements like dovetails or horns, the invention introduces a metal brace as a composite material component. This metal element provides the necessary mechanical strength for break-in resistance while the plastic socket and its simple fixing elements maintain manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution significantly enhances break-in resistance by ensuring the deadbolt remains in the socket even when the window sash is bent or shifted, maintaining the window in a closed position and preventing unauthorized opening.

Implementation Method 1

the pressure of the handle deadbolt, counterbalanced by the reactive force of the working surface of the deadbolt recess supported by the brace arm, generates a moment of force leading to a bending of the brace arm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMoment of force: Torque

Implementation Method 2

a protrusion in the deadbolt, seated in the socket immersed in the deadbolt-adjacent surface... during an attempt to force in the window sash from the outside, the deadbolt takes the deadbolt socket along with itself, rotating it around the fixing point of the brace

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectKinematic pair:

Data Source

PatentEP2826934B1Roof window frame comprising a deadbolt socket assembly, having an increased break-in resistance
Publication Date: 2016.09.28 FAKRO PP SPOLKA Z O O
  • EP2826934B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2826934B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2826934B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b

AI summary

The invention relates to a deadbolt socket immersed in the frame, supported with a brace fixed in a recess, the brace and the deadbolt socket being preferably connected with one another after assembling in the frame, and having a common possibility of a limited rotational movement around an axis away from the deadbolt and fixed in the frame, after exceeding a fixed limit moment of force acting in the direction of pulling the deadbolt socket out of the recess.