Deadleg Design with Narrowed Inlet for Hydrate Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hydrate plugs frequently form in deadlegs of oil and gas production systems, leading to operational interruptions and safety risks due to the lack of constant flow, which existing solutions like heat tracing, insulation, and chemical injection fail to adequately address, especially in subsea environments where temperatures are lower.

Innovation Solution

A deadleg design with a larger diameter than traditional designs, combined with a narrowed inlet to restrict water entry, effectively reduces hydrate formation by increasing the distance mixing cells can cover and minimizing water saturation, thereby postponing or preventing plugging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional deadleg design with minimum required diameter is used, then device complexity and cost are reduced, but hydrate plug formation occurs frequently leading to operational interruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational continuityVSAvoiddeadleg diameter size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the diameter parameter of the deadleg from the minimum required size to a larger size. This parameter change increases the volume of the deadleg, thereby reducing the concentration of hydrates and preventing plug formation, which resolves the contradiction between reliability and device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a one-dimensional constraint (minimum diameter for flow) to a two-dimensional design consideration (diameter for both flow and hydrate prevention). By increasing the diameter dimension, the system achieves hydrate plug prevention while maintaining functional requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If the deadleg diameter is increased to prevent hydrate plugs, then operational reliability improves, but the amount of material and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrate plug preventionVSAvoidmaterial consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter change by increasing the deadleg diameter from minimum required to a larger size. This change in dimensional parameter directly prevents hydrate plug formation by reducing hydrate concentration, while the material quantity increase is acceptable given the critical reliability benefit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a narrowed inlet is added to restrict water entry, then hydrate formation is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrate formationVSAvoidinlet restriction structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a narrowed inlet section specifically at the water entry point, while the rest of the deadleg maintains its expanded diameter. This localized restriction of water entry reduces hydrate formation at the source without requiring complex structures throughout the entire deadleg system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design extends the viable length of deadlegs, reduces operational interruptions, and enhances safety by minimizing the risk of hydrate formation and associated safety hazards, while being cost-effective and easily applicable to both surface and subsea systems.

Implementation Method 1

increasing the distance mixing cells can cover and minimizing water saturation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMixing cells: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentUS9297237B2Deadleg
Publication Date: 2016.03.29 EQUINOR ENERGY AS
  • US9297237B2 patent drawing
  • US9297237B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An essentially cylindrical deadleg having a first cross sectional area at one end of the deadleg and a second cross sectional area, the first cross sectional area being smaller than the second cross sectional area.