Dealer Device Automating Table Game Operations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Historically, felt table games like Blackjack and Baccarat have been limited in innovation due to the complexity of dealer operations, restricting new game developments to simple side bets or variants that do not require significant changes in dealer procedures.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for managing complex table games using real cards and virtual chips or game credits, featuring a dealer device with a display unit, memory, and control unit to automate dealer activities, and a player device for wagering and account management, enabling advanced game variants and secondary contests.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If dealer-operated felt table games are kept simple for ease of operation, then dealer complexity is reduced, but game innovation and versatility are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedealer operation simplicityVSAvoidgame innovation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The game system is divided into distinct functional modules: physical card dealing area, electronic display units for each player, centralized control system, and automated payout mechanism. This segmentation allows the dealer to focus solely on simple card distribution while electronic systems handle complex game logic, enabling both operational simplicity and game versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Electronic display units and control systems serve as intermediaries between the dealer and players, and between players and payout mechanisms. These intermediaries automate complex functions including wager tracking, game rule enforcement, and credit management, allowing the dealer to maintain simple operations while the system supports sophisticated game variants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If automated systems are introduced to enable complex game variants, then game versatility is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegame variant capabilityVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The electronic control system is designed as a universal platform that can accommodate multiple different game variants through software configuration rather than hardware changes. The same physical table and display units can support various games including blackjack, baccarat, and custom variants, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Virtual representations of chips, cards, and game elements are used instead of physical counterparts for tracking and display. Electronic credits replicate the function of physical chips, and digital card images replicate physical cards, simplifying the physical system while enabling complex game logic through software.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If virtual chips and electronic credits are used instead of physical chips, then operational efficiency is improved, but tactile experience is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedealer processing speedVSAvoidplayer interaction quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges physical and electronic elements by maintaining physical cards and display units at the table while using electronic signals for tracking and payout. Players interact with physical components (cards, display screens) while the backend uses electronic credit tracking, combining the tactile satisfaction of physical games with the efficiency of electronic automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from two-dimensional physical chip handling to multi-dimensional electronic tracking that includes visual displays, automated calculations, and networked credit management. This dimensional expansion allows simultaneous local player interaction and centralized system control, improving efficiency without completely removing physical elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11972666B1System and method for controlling operation of a game device
Publication Date: 2024.04.30 DEWAAL IP LLC
  • US11972666B1 patent drawing
  • US11972666B1 patent drawing
  • US11972666B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system, and method of operating a system, including a dealer device and at least one player device located at a gaming device. The dealer device configured to allow a dealer to enter funds received from a player to a respective player account, to allow the dealer to finalize wagers and enter an outcome of a game; to calculate a change in the player account based on the outcome of the game. The player device configured to display a player screen including computer generated graphics; to allow each respective player to enter a wager on the game; to display an outcome of the instance of the game; and to display wager and player account data to the player.