Deammonification Control via pH and Conductivity Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Deammonification processes in wastewater treatment face challenges in maintaining optimal pH and alkalinity levels, leading to potential inhibition of anaerobic ammonium oxidation bacteria and excessive growth of nitrite oxidizing bacteria, which affects the efficiency and stability of nitrogen removal.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that control airflow in deammonification MBBR processes using pH, alkalinity, specific conductivity, and ammonium concentration sensors to maintain target levels, preventing drastic pH drops and promoting consistent effluent characteristics by adjusting aeration based on real-time sensor data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If aeration is increased to maintain pH levels, then pH stability is improved, but risk of nitrite oxidizing bacteria growth increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovepH stabilityVSAvoidnitrite oxidizing bacteria growth
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors pH levels and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust aeration rates, maintaining pH stability while preventing conditions that promote nitrite oxidizing bacteria growth by avoiding excessive aeration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes aeration parameters (rate, timing) based on real-time pH measurements and process conditions, optimizing oxygen supply to maintain pH while limiting conditions favorable for nitrite oxidizing bacteria

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If aeration is decreased to prevent nitrite oxidizing bacteria growth, then harmful factor is reduced, but pH control becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenitrite oxidizing bacteria growthVSAvoidpH control
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The control system uses continuous feedback from pH sensors and ammonium sensors to dynamically adjust aeration, ensuring sufficient oxygen supply for pH maintenance while limiting aeration to prevent nitrite oxidizing bacteria proliferation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts aeration rates based on changing process conditions, increasing aeration when pH requires support and decreasing it when nitrite oxidizing bacteria growth risk increases, achieving both objectives through adaptive control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If multiple sensors are used for monitoring, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess monitoring accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system integrates multiple sensors (pH, ammonium, conductivity) into a single multi-functional monitoring platform that performs multiple measurement and control functions, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines multiple sensing functions and control operations into an integrated control algorithm that processes data from all sensors collectively, simplifying the control architecture while leveraging the precision of multiple measurement parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures near-complete use of influent alkalinity, minimizes ammonium concentration in the effluent, and reduces the risk of nitrite oxidizing bacteria growth, thereby enhancing the stability and efficiency of nitrogen removal processes.

Implementation Method 1

aerobic ammonium oxidizing bacteria ("AOB") convert about 50% of the incoming ammonia to nitrite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

anaerobic ammonium oxidizing bacteria ("AMX") convert the remaining ammonium and nitrite to nitrogen gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAnaerobic oxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 3

pH, specific conductivity, ammonium concentration, nitrate concentration, nitrite concentration, or dissolved oxygen concentration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectpH measurement:

Implementation Method 4

pH, specific conductivity, ammonium concentration, nitrate concentration, nitrite concentration, or dissolved oxygen concentration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conductivity: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS9902635B2Method for deammonification process control using pH, specific conductivity, or ammonia
Publication Date: 2018.02.27 HAMPTON ROADS SANITATION DISTRICT
  • US9902635B2 patent drawing
  • US9902635B2 patent drawing
  • US9902635B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and a system as described herein, including a method and system of treating ammonium containing water in a deammonification MBBR process where partial nitritation and anaerobic ammonium oxidation may occur simultaneously in a biofilm, or in an integrated fixed film activated sludge process where partial nitritation takes place in a suspended growth fraction and anaerobic ammonium oxidation occurs in a biofilm. The method and system include controlling airflow to the reactor to achieve a target pH, a target alkalinity, a target specific conductivity, and/or a target ammonium concentration in the reactor or in the effluent.