Debiasing Text-to-Image Diffusion Models via Attribute Distribution Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Text-to-Image (TTI) models exhibit bias in generated images, leading to imbalanced distributions of attributes such as color, which deviate from natural occurrences.

Innovation Solution

The method involves obtaining multiple images from an image generating model based on a prompt, determining the attributes of these images, and updating the model to align with a predetermined distribution of attributes, thereby reducing bias.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If Text-to-Image models are used for image generation, then image generation capability is achieved, but attribute distribution bias occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage generation capabilityVSAvoidattribute distribution accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the generated images are evaluated for attribute distribution, and the model parameters are updated based on the evaluation results. The loss function computes the difference between predicted and target attribute distributions, guiding the model to generate images with more accurate attribute distributions while maintaining generation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the model parameters through iterative optimization based on attribute distribution evaluation. By adjusting the parameters to minimize the loss function that measures distribution discrepancy, the model transforms from generating biased images to generating images with balanced attribute distributions, resolving the contradiction between generation capability and distribution accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple images are generated to evaluate attributes, then attribute distribution can be assessed, but computational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattribute distribution assessment accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent generates multiple images per iteration to sufficiently assess attribute distribution, accepting increased computational cost as necessary to achieve accurate measurement. This partial excessive action ensures that the attribute distribution evaluation is based on sufficient sample size, enabling precise assessment and effective model optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If the model is updated to reduce bias, then attribute distribution accuracy improves, but model complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattribute distribution accuracyVSAvoidmodel updating mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates attribute distribution evaluation and loss computation as preliminary steps in the training process. By pre-defining the loss function that measures distribution discrepancy and integrating it into the optimization objective, the system systematically reduces bias through structured model updates, improving attribute distribution accuracy through a methodical approach that manages complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250139846A1Debiasing text-to-image diffusion models
Publication Date: 2025.05.01 LEMON INC(GB)
  • US20250139846A1 patent drawing
  • US20250139846A1 patent drawing
  • US20250139846A1 patent drawing

AI summary

There are provided methods, devices, and computer program products for image generation, particularly to debiasing text-to-image diffusion models. In a method, a plurality of images are obtained by an image generating model based on a prompt. The plurality of images comprises a plurality of instances of an object, respectively and the object is specified by the prompt. A plurality of attributes of the plurality of instances of the object are determined respectively. The image generating model is updated based on the plurality of attributes and a predetermined distribution of a plurality of predetermined attributes related to the object. With the above method, the images generated by the updated image generating model may follow the predetermined distribution, and the updated image generating model may output debiased results.