3D Printing Debinder with Solvent Recycling and Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing metal injection molding (MIM) and additive manufacturing processes face challenges in efficiently debinding green parts, particularly in controlling debinding parameters such as time, solvent circulation, and solvent exchange, which can affect the quality and efficiency of the debinding process.

Innovation Solution

A debinder system comprising a storage chamber, process chamber, distill chamber, and condenser is introduced, along with a controller that determines debinding parameters based on the geometry and mass of the green part, ensuring optimal debinding by controlling solvent volume, circulation, and exchange, and includes a purging device to manage solvent vapors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional debinding processes are used, then the process is simple, but the debinding parameters (time, solvent circulation, solvent exchange) cannot be effectively controlled, affecting quality and efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebinding parameter controlVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The debinder system is divided into multiple functional chambers: storage chamber for solvent, process chamber for debinding, distill chamber for solvent recovery, and condenser for vapor condensation. This segmentation allows independent control of each function while maintaining overall system coordination through the controller, resolving the contradiction between control precision and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The controller receives input about green part properties (geometry, mass) and automatically determines optimal debinding parameters including solvent volume, circulation rate, and exchange timing. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables precise parameter control without requiring complex manual intervention, addressing the contradiction between manufacturing precision and operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If solvent volume is increased to improve debinding effectiveness, then debinding quality improves, but resource consumption and environmental impact increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebinding qualityVSAvoidsolvent consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The distill chamber collects solvent vapor that would otherwise be wasted, and the condenser converts this vapor back into liquid solvent. The recovered solvent is then returned to the storage chamber for reuse in the debinding process. This recovery system significantly reduces solvent consumption while maintaining debinding quality, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing precision and substance loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Manufacturing precision

If debinding time is extended to improve completeness, then binder removal is more thorough, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinder removal completenessVSAvoiddebinding throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous solvent circulation throughout the debinding process, ensuring that fresh solvent constantly contacts the green part to dissolve binder. The controller monitors and adjusts circulation parameters to optimize the balance between binder removal completeness and processing time, enabling thorough debinding without excessive time extension, thus resolving the contradiction between manufacturing precision and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively debinds green parts by recycling solvents, conserving resources, and maintaining a safe environment, while ensuring efficient and controlled debinding processes, improving the quality of the final product.

Implementation Method 1

distilled in the distill chamber to produce a solvent vapor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

The condenser may be configured to condense the solvent vapor to the liquid solvent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Data Source

PatentUS11407027B2Debinder for 3D objects
Publication Date: 2022.08.09 DESKTOP METAL INC
  • US11407027B2 patent drawing
  • US11407027B2 patent drawing
  • US11407027B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A debinder provides for debinding printed green parts in an additive manufacturing system. The debinder can include a storage chamber, a process chamber, a distill chamber, a waste chamber, and a condenser. The storage chamber stores a liquid solvent for debinding the green part. The process chamber debinds the green part using a volume of the liquid solvent transferred from the storage chamber. The distill chamber collects a solution drained from the process chamber and produces a solvent vapor from the solution. The condenser condenses the solvent vapor to the liquid solvent and transfer the liquid solvent to the storage chamber. The waste chamber collects a waste component of the solution.