Debt Collection Assignment Algorithm Using Trait Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current debt collection systems fail to effectively match debt collection parties with debts based on their strengths and weaknesses, leading to inefficient debt collection and inaccurate credit scoring, as they do not consider the traits of all parties involved in a credit lending and debt collecting transaction.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that analyzes the traits of creditors, debt collection parties, and individual debts to determine the best-suited collection party for each debt, using statistical algorithms to optimize debt assignment and potentially modify credit scores based on collectability, thereby enhancing credit and lending practices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional debt collection systems assign debts to collection parties without statistical analysis of traits, then the assignment process is simple and quick, but the collection efficiency and accuracy are poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebt collection efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary statistical analysis of collection party traits and debt characteristics before assignment occurs. Historical performance data, geographic information, debt amount, and other traits are pre-analyzed to create probability models that predict collection success, so when a debt needs assignment, the optimal collection party can be quickly identified based on pre-computed statistics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A statistical analysis intermediary layer is introduced between the debt assignment request and the collection party selection. This intermediary performs trait matching by comparing debt characteristics with collection party strengths and weaknesses, using probability models to determine the best match, thereby resolving the contradiction between simple assignment and efficient collection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If credit scores are based solely on traditional factors without considering debt collectability, then the credit scoring process is straightforward, but the accuracy of risk assessment is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecredit score accuracyVSAvoidscoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges traditional credit scoring factors with debt collectability analysis. By combining borrower traits, debt characteristics, and collection party capabilities into a unified statistical model, the credit score reflects both the borrower's creditworthiness and the likelihood of successful collection, providing a more comprehensive risk assessment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback from actual collection outcomes to continuously refine credit scoring accuracy. Historical collection data is fed back into the statistical models to improve predictions of future collectability, making credit scores more accurate over time while maintaining a manageable system through automated learning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If collection parties are not matched to debts based on their strengths and weaknesses, then the assignment process is simple, but the likelihood of successful collection is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollection success rateVSAvoidmatching system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by matching specific debt characteristics with specific collection party strengths. Rather than general assignment, the statistical analysis identifies which collection parties have proven successful with particular debt types, amounts, or geographic regions, assigning debts to the locally optimal collection party based on trait compatibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of debt assignment by introducing statistical probability models that evaluate multiple traits simultaneously. Instead of simple first-come-first-served or manual assignment, the system transforms the assignment process into a parameter-based optimization problem, comparing debt parameters with collection party parameters to maximize collection probability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240013110A1System and method for enhancing credit and debt collection
Publication Date: 2024.01.11 NEU IP LLC
  • US20240013110A1 patent drawing
  • US20240013110A1 patent drawing
  • US20240013110A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for enhancing assignment of debtor accounts to a plurality of collection parties is presented. The preferred embodiment is capable of optimizing the way by which individual performance entities are assigned to collect on actionable individual debtor accounts by a creditor. An analysis solution uses algorithms to analyze gathered data and to provide a score to each collection party based upon the traits of the individual collection parties, debtor accounts, creditor, externally acquired data, and constraints upon all of the parties involved. The system and method are also capable of enhancing an individual borrower's credit score depending on the risk involved with providing credit to that particular borrower based upon the collectability upon default. One embodiment of the invention would include a risk analysis and compliance assessment system for supply entities to evaluate potential performance entities or other entities.