Debtor Portfolio Optimization Using Reinforcement Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems lack an efficient method for optimizing the collection of credit-based assets from debtors, leading to suboptimal resource utilization and reduced operational efficiency in businesses.

Innovation Solution

A self-learning system that utilizes an action optimization manager to generate debtor portfolios based on debtor scoring models and state-action values, optimizing the order and timing of collection actions through reinforcement learning and multi-knapsack problem formulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional collection methods are used, then operational simplicity is maintained, but collection efficiency and resource utilization are suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollection efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs self-learning algorithms that automatically optimize collection strategies without requiring manual intervention. The reinforcement learning model continuously learns from collection outcomes and autonomously adjusts debtor portfolio assignments, action sequences, and resource allocation, enabling the system to improve collection efficiency while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional manual collection management with automated computing systems that use machine learning algorithms. The action optimization manager substitutes human decision-making with algorithmic optimization, using state-action value calculations and reinforcement learning to determine optimal collection strategies, thereby improving productivity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If more collection resources are deployed, then collection effectiveness improves, but operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollection effectivenessVSAvoidoperational costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts collection parameters such as the number of contact attempts, timing of actions, and debtor portfolio compositions based on learned state-action values. By optimizing these parameters through reinforcement learning, the system maximizes collection effectiveness while minimizing resource consumption, achieving better returns on collection efforts without proportionally increasing operational costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The action optimization manager determines the optimal level of collection actions to take on each debtor portfolio, avoiding both insufficient and excessive actions. The system learns to apply just the right amount of collection effort based on debtor characteristics and historical outcomes, preventing waste of resources on overly aggressive collection while ensuring adequate follow-up on high-probability cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If manual debtor assessment is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but debtor selection accuracy is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebtor selection accuracyVSAvoidassessment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where collection outcomes are continuously fed back to the reinforcement learning model. The model uses this feedback to update state-action values and improve future debtor portfolio selections. This automated feedback mechanism enhances debtor selection accuracy by learning from actual collection results, replacing subjective manual assessment with data-driven algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The action optimization manager serves as an intermediary between raw debtor data and collection decisions. It processes debtor information through state-action value calculations and reinforcement learning to generate optimized portfolio assignments, acting as a intelligent mediator that transforms unstructured data into actionable collection strategies with high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250371621A1Self-learning system for debtor selection and collector action optimization
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 DELL PROD LP
  • US20250371621A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371621A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371621A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for managing collection of assets includes obtaining, using an action optimization manager, debtor information, associated with a set of debtor devices each executing on a computing device, from a data source, generating a set of state spaces based on debtor attributes of the debtor information, wherein each of the set of state spaces is a vector comprising debtor features obtained from the debtor information, applying an action-reward analysis on the set of debtor devices using the set of state spaces to generate state-action values for each of the set of debtor devices, applying, using the state action values, a profile analysis to obtain, for each of a set of collection devices, a debtor portfolio, and implementing collection actions based on the debtor portfolio for each of the set of debtor devices.