Automated Debugging Instruction Rewriting for Data Engines
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
The debugging process for data engines like Flink and Spark is lengthy and inefficient due to the need for manual rewriting and trial-and-error of debugging instructions, such as SQL statements, which consumes significant time and resources.
Innovation Solution
A method for instruction rewriting that includes generating a debugging instruction based on request information, processing it to acquire a running log, rewriting the instruction based on exception handling or result differences to produce a rewritten instruction using pre-constructed models, and providing response information for user feedback.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If manual rewriting and trial-and-error of debugging instructions is performed, then debugging can be achieved, but the debugging process becomes time-consuming and inefficient
Solution Approach 1:
The system enables self-service by automatically generating debugging instructions and executing debugging tasks without requiring manual intervention. The debugging instruction generation module creates SQL statements based on user-provided description information, and the automated execution module runs these instructions and analyzes results automatically, allowing the system to debug itself without human rewriting efforts.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent replaces the mechanical manual rewriting process with an automated computer-based system. Instead of humans manually crafting and adjusting SQL debugging instructions, the system uses computer programs to generate, execute, and analyze debugging instructions automatically, substituting human mechanical work with automated computational processes.
2Reliability
If manual rewriting of debugging instructions is required, then debugging can be performed, but significant time and resources are consumed
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs self-service by automatically generating and executing debugging instructions. The debugging instruction generation module transforms user description information into executable SQL statements automatically, and the automated execution module processes these instructions and analyzes results without requiring manual rewriting, thereby improving productivity while maintaining debugging capability.
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements feedback mechanisms where the automated execution module analyzes the results of debugging instruction execution and feeds this information back to generate improved instructions. This iterative feedback loop continuously refines debugging instructions based on actual execution results, enhancing both capability and efficiency without manual intervention.
3Productivity
If automated debugging instruction generation is implemented, then debugging efficiency improves, but system complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system segments the debugging process into distinct functional modules: a debugging instruction generation module that creates SQL statements from description information, an automated execution module that runs these instructions, and a result analysis module that processes execution outcomes. This segmentation allows each module to handle specific tasks independently, managing overall system complexity through modular design while maintaining high productivity.
Data Source
AI summary
A method for instruction rewriting, an electronic device, and a computer-readable storage medium are provided. The method includes: generating a debugging instruction based on instruction description information carried in a received debugging request; acquiring a debugging running log corresponding to the debugging instruction, where the debugging running log is obtained by processing the debugging instruction; and in response to the debugging running log indicating a running exception, rewriting the debugging instruction based on exception handling information corresponding to the exception to obtain a rewritten instruction, and in response to the debugging running log indicating that running is normal, rewriting the debugging instruction based on difference description information between an expected debugging result carried in the debugging request and an actual debugging result corresponding to the debugging instruction to obtain the rewritten instruction, where the actual debugging result is obtained by processing the debugging instruction.