Debugger Canvas Code Bubble Reuse for Control Flow
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Debuggers lack the ability to reuse code bubbles, leading to overwhelming amounts of onscreen information that hinder software developers' understanding and conceptualization of program control flow during debugging.
Innovation Solution
Implementing a system where code bubbles from prior debugger sessions are reused and their context data compared across sessions to identify differences in application execution, allowing for a more manageable visualization of control flow on a debugger canvas.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If code bubbles are created for every execution session, then complete execution tracking is achieved, but the amount of onscreen information becomes overwhelming
Solution Approach 1:
The system discards old code bubbles after a certain number of executions and recovers/reuses them in subsequent sessions. This allows the debugger to maintain execution tracking completeness while reducing onscreen information complexity by reusing previously executed code paths instead of displaying every execution separately.
Solution Approach 2:
The system creates a simplified copy or representation of code bubbles from previous execution sessions that can be reused in current sessions. This copying approach maintains the essential execution tracking information while presenting a more manageable simplified view on screen.
2Loss of information
If all code bubbles from prior sessions are displayed, then execution history is preserved, but developer understanding of control flow is hindered
Solution Approach 1:
The system extracts and separates relevant execution history information from the complete set of code bubbles. By taking out only the essential control flow information and separating it from redundant details, the system preserves execution history while making control flow understanding more manageable for developers.
Solution Approach 2:
The system segments the execution history into manageable portions, displaying only the most relevant code bubbles from prior sessions while grouping or filtering out less important information. This segmentation allows developers to understand control flow without being overwhelmed by all historical execution details.
3Device complexity
If code bubbles are reused across sessions, then onscreen information is reduced, but execution context accuracy may be compromised
Solution Approach 1:
The system dynamically adapts code bubbles for reuse across execution sessions. Instead of static reuse, the system updates and modifies code bubble representations to maintain execution context accuracy while still reducing onscreen information complexity through reuse of recognizable patterns and structures.
Data Source
AI summary
A debugger session is initiated to monitor application execution. A debugger canvas corresponding to the debugger session is identified and displayed. The displayed debugger canvas includes one or more code bubbles created during a prior debugger session. The one or more code bubbles already present on the displayed debugger canvas are reused during the current debugger session. Accordingly, existing code bubbles and bubble sets are reused on a debugger canvas when entering a debug session, thus providing a more stable and manageable view for debugging an application in an integrated development environment. The code fragments in code bubbles on a debugger canvas can be analyzed, inspected, and edited during or after a debug session. Notations can also be added to a debugger canvas in the form of note bubbles and context data bubbles.


