Debugger Expression Reevaluation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional debuggers automatically reevaluate expressions, which can lead to unwanted side effects, especially when evaluating explicit expressions, causing potential crashes or masking existing bugs, and fail to distinguish between stale and invalid expression values.

Innovation Solution

Implement a system where expressions can be disabled from automatic reevaluation, generating evaluation errors for stale or out-of-scope expressions, and allowing manual refresh with a specified time limit for evaluation, indicated by visual cues like grayed-out font and a refresh icon.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the debugger automatically reevaluates expressions to keep values current, then the expression values remain accurate and up-to-date, but side effects may occur causing crashes or masking bugs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexpression value accuracyVSAvoidapplication stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system differentiates between different types of expressions (explicit vs implicit) and applies different reevaluation behaviors to each. Explicit expressions are disabled from automatic reevaluation to prevent side effects, while implicit expressions continue to be reevaluated automatically. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by applying quality control selectively rather than uniformly across all expressions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the debugger disables automatic reevaluation of explicit expressions to prevent side effects, then application crashes and bug masking are avoided, but expression values may become stale and inaccurate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication stabilityVSAvoidexpression value accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the debugger monitors for actions that cause expression values to become stale (such as stepping through code, switching threads, or changing call stack frames). When such actions are detected, the system provides visual indicators (grayed-out font, refresh icon) and allows manual reevaluation. This feedback loop maintains reliability while enabling users to refresh values when needed, resolving the accuracy concern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the debugger manually refreshes expressions after disabling automatic reevaluation, then side effects are avoided during automatic updates, but additional user actions are required to keep values current

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication stabilityVSAvoiddebugging convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by providing clear visual indicators (grayed-out font, refresh icons) that automatically appear when expression values become stale. The debugger autonomously detects when reevaluation is needed and presents the option to the user without requiring constant manual intervention. This maintains reliability while preserving ease of operation through intuitive, automated guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Loss of information

If the debugger evaluates all expressions including implicit ones, then comprehensive debugging information is available, but the risk of side effects increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebugging information completenessVSAvoidside effect risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by categorizing expressions into explicit and implicit types and applying different reevaluation policies to each. Implicit expressions (properties, method calls) are excluded from automatic reevaluation to minimize side effect risks, while still allowing manual reevaluation when needed. This selective approach maintains debugging information completeness for critical expressions while reducing overall side effect exposure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS7636913B2System and method for evaluating an expression in a debugger
Publication Date: 2009.12.22 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US7636913B2 patent drawing
  • US7636913B2 patent drawing
  • US7636913B2 patent drawing

AI summary

When an expression is first entered into a debugger, the expression may be automatically evaluated. Later, when the debugger detects an action that causes the value of the expression to become stale, the expression may be reevaluated with a setting to disable the automatic reevaluation of certain designated disabled expressions. The disabled expressions may be expressions such as, for example, explicit expressions, which are more likely to result in side effects. Alternatively, for even greater protection against side effects, the disabled expressions may include both explicit and implicit expressions.