Deburring Cutter Blade Holder with Integrated Release Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing deburring cutter devices require secondary tools for blade removal, making the process awkward, complicated, and unsafe, and lack a secure and durable mechanism for holding replaceable blades.

Innovation Solution

A deburring cutter device with a handle module featuring a locking sleeve and blade holder configured with a tension component and actuator release, allowing for reversible blade securement and easy exchange without additional tools, utilizing a compression fit mechanism to securely hold the blade.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a secondary tool (key) is used to remove the blade, then the blade can be securely held, but the blade removal process becomes awkward, complicated, and unsafe

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade holding securityVSAvoidblade removal convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The blade holder incorporates an integrated release mechanism that allows the user to remove the blade directly without requiring a separate key or secondary tool. The release button or lever is built into the handle, enabling one-handed operation where the user can simultaneously hold the tool and remove the blade, making the system self-sufficient and eliminating the need for external removal tools

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The function of blade retention and blade release is merged into a single integrated blade holder assembly. The locking mechanism and release mechanism are combined in one component rather than being separate tools, allowing both secure holding and easy removal functions to be performed by the same device without requiring multiple separate tools

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If a tapered blade configuration is used, then the blade can be locked into the handle, but blade replacement requires complicated ejection procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade locking capabilityVSAvoidblade replacement procedure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The blade holder is segmented into distinct functional zones: a tapered locking zone that secures the blade through friction and geometric interference, and a separate release zone activated by a button or lever that disengages the locking mechanism. This segmentation allows the blade to be firmly locked during operation but easily released when needed, separating the locking and releasing functions into different operational modes of the same component

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The blade holder transitions between two dynamic states: a locked state where the tapered surfaces maintain frictional contact and geometric interference to secure the blade, and an unlocked state where actuation of the release mechanism reduces the clamping force or disengages the taper, allowing blade removal. This dynamic switching between locked and unlocked states simplifies the replacement procedure while maintaining secure holding during use

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If a separate key is required for blade removal, then blade security is maintained, but user safety is compromised due to awkward and complicated procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade retentionVSAvoiduser safety risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The blade holder incorporates an integrated release mechanism that allows the user to remove the blade directly without requiring a separate key or secondary tool. The release button or lever is built into the handle, enabling one-handed operation where the user can simultaneously hold the tool and remove the blade, making the system self-sufficient and eliminating the need for external removal tools that could be misused or cause injury

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary release mechanism (button, lever, or cam) is introduced between the user's hand and the blade removal action. This intermediary component provides a controlled, safe interface for blade ejection, allowing the user to activate blade release through a deliberate pressing or lifting motion rather than through awkward manual manipulation or use of separate tools that could slip or cause injury

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables secure and convenient replacement of blades without extra tools, ensuring consistent holding power and safety by using a compression fit mechanism that prevents unintended blade removal.

Implementation Method 1

a tension component and an actuator release... utilizing a compression fit mechanism to securely hold the blade

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11833702B2Deburring cutter
Publication Date: 2023.12.05 SLICE SAFETY CUTTER INC
  • US11833702B2 patent drawing
  • US11833702B2 patent drawing
  • US11833702B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention generally relates to cutting devices. Specifically, the present invention relates to a deburring cutter device. In some examples, the deburring cutter includes a handle module, a blade, and a blade cover. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the handle module includes a blade holder configured with a blade cavity having walls which are adapted to reversibly secure the blade, allowing the blade to be selectively removed.