Decentralized Control Modules for Oxygen Reduction Plant

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing oxygen reduction systems face challenges in large or complex environments, such as high manufacturing, installation, and maintenance costs, along with reliability and energy management issues, due to their centralized control architecture, which becomes cumbersome and inefficient as the system size increases.

Innovation Solution

A decentralized control and regulation system using standardized controller modules that distribute control functions across multiple signal-connected modules, allowing for modular adaptation, redundancy, and easy expansion, with each module capable of performing distinct control functions and communicating via a ring bus system for enhanced reliability and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a centralized control center is used to regulate all nitrogen generators, oxygen concentration sensors, and actuators, then the system can achieve predetermined oxygen levels, but the system complexity, installation cost, and maintenance difficulty increase significantly with larger numbers of protected areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxygen level control reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the centralized control center into multiple decentralized control units, each responsible for a specific protected area or group of nitrogen generators. This segmentation reduces the complexity of the central control system while maintaining reliable oxygen level control in each zone through local decision-making capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If numerous power supply and signal cables are laid between all components and the control center, then all components can be regulated, but installation becomes labor-intensive and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem regulation capabilityVSAvoidinstallation effort and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the control system into distributed control units located near respective protected areas, the patent reduces cable lengths and quantities needed for power and signal transmission. Each control unit handles local components, minimizing the extensive wiring required in centralized architectures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If standard-required line monitoring of all power supply lines is implemented, then safety requirements are met, but the complexity of monitoring increases with more lines and longer lengths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety complianceVSAvoidline monitoring complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements line monitoring at the decentralized control unit level rather than centrally. Each control unit monitors its own power supply lines and connected components locally, reducing the complexity of centralized monitoring while ensuring safety compliance across all protected areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If the control center is designed with sufficient computing power and numerous interfaces, then it can accommodate large numbers of nitrogen generators, sensors, and actuators, but manufacturing and maintenance costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capacityVSAvoidmanufacturing and maintenance cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent distributes the computing power and interface requirements across multiple decentralized control units rather than concentrating them in a single high-capacity control center. Each control unit has modest computational requirements for its local zone, reducing overall manufacturing costs and simplifying maintenance while maintaining system capacity through modular scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

5Adaptability or versatility

If retrofitting and expanding the oxygen reduction system is performed, then system capacity can be increased, but wiring and reconfiguration become complex tasks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem expandabilityVSAvoidretrofitting complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The modular decentralized architecture allows new protected areas or nitrogen generators to be added by simply adding new control units without reconfiguring existing wiring. Each control unit is self-contained and can be independently installed, making retrofitting and expansion straightforward compared to centralized systems where changes require system-wide reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3569290B1Control and regulating system for an oxygen reducing installation
Publication Date: 2024.02.14 WAGNER GROUP GMBH
  • EP3569290B1 patent drawingFigure 1a
  • EP3569290B1 patent drawingFigure 1b
  • EP3569290B1 patent drawingFigure 2a

AI summary

The invention relates to a control and regulation system for an oxygen reduction plant, comprising at least one inert gas generator (30a, 30b), at least one oxygen concentration sensor (31a, 40), and at least one actuator (32, 33, 41) for the release of inert gas, wherein the control and regulation system has several interconnected control modules (22, 24), each configured or configurable such that one or more control functions can be performed, wherein the control functions are distributed decentrally across at least two interconnected control modules (22, 24).