Decentralized Load Balancing via Self-Reporting DNS Records

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Small to medium-sized organizations face challenges in supporting the complexity and expense of centralized load balancers, and maintaining them is beyond their capabilities, necessitating a decentralized address control solution compatible with existing DNS servers.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of decentralized load balancing systems that allow server instances to automatically determine availability and post DNS records, directing client requests to the most available unit without a centralized load balancer, using monitoring applications that report load characteristics to a network address resolution resource like a DNS server.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If centralized load balancers are deployed to achieve load balancing and high availability, then service availability and load distribution are improved, but device complexity and operational difficulty increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice availabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized load balancer functionality is segmented and distributed to individual server instances. Each server instance independently monitors its own availability and publishes DNS records, eliminating the need for a centralized control device. This segmentation reduces system complexity while maintaining load balancing capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Server instances perform self-service by automatically monitoring their own availability status and publishing their own DNS records. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for external centralized management, reducing operational difficulty and device complexity while ensuring high availability through automatic failover.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If centralized load balancers are used to distribute client requests, then load distribution is improved, but expense and operational capability requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload distribution efficiencyVSAvoidmaintenance capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Each server instance autonomously monitors its availability and publishes DNS records without requiring external configuration or management. This self-service approach eliminates the need for specialized operational capabilities while maintaining efficient load distribution through automatic client request routing to available instances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The DNS server is utilized for multiple purposes: its traditional domain name resolution function plus dynamic availability-based load balancing. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for dedicated load balancer hardware, reducing expense while maintaining load distribution efficiency through the DNS server's existing infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If dedicated load balancer devices are deployed, then load balancing performance is improved, but cost and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload balancing performanceVSAvoidhardware resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Existing DNS servers and server instances are made multi-functional by enabling them to perform both their traditional functions and load balancing operations. The DNS server resolves domain names and dynamically publishes availability information, while server instances handle their primary workloads and simultaneously monitor their own availability. This eliminates the need for dedicated load balancer hardware while maintaining load balancing performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using a single centralized load balancer, the load balancing functionality is copied to each server instance. Each instance maintains its own availability monitoring and DNS publication capabilities, creating redundant distributed load balancing nodes that improve reliability while utilizing existing hardware resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10250677B1Decentralized network address control
Publication Date: 2019.04.02 CYBER ARK SOFTWARE LTD
  • US10250677B1 patent drawing
  • US10250677B1 patent drawing
  • US10250677B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for decentralized network address control, including a computer-implemented method for decentralized load balancing for a plurality of network resources. The method can include determining a load characteristic for the first network resource. The load characteristic can be determined by a first load balancing application associated with a first network resource. The method can further include sending a report to a network address resolution resource, based on the determined load characteristic. The network address resolution resource can be configured to also receive reports from other load balancing applications associated with other network resources based on determined load characteristics for the other network resources. Both the first network resource and the other network resources can be associated with a common network resource name. The method can further include receiving a request to communicate with the first network resource after sending, and because of sending, the report.