Decentralized Lock Manager for Multi-Core Architectures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In multi-core computer architectures, managing locks becomes increasingly complex and communication-intensive as the number of processors increases, leading to communication delays and resource burdens due to the need for centralized lock management and high network traffic.

Innovation Solution

A decentralized lock management system where each processing device has a lock manager that broadcasts messages over an interconnection network to manage lock ownership and requests, reducing the number of messages and network traffic by using a distributed waiting list and finite state machine logic to handle lock creation, transfer, and ownership.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If centralized lock management is used in multi-core architectures, then lock ownership can be tracked, but communication burden and network traffic increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelock ownership trackingVSAvoidcommunication burden
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the centralized lock management system into distributed lock managers, one at each processing device. Each lock manager independently tracks lock ownership for its local processor, segmenting the monolithic communication burden into smaller, localized units. This segmentation reduces overall network traffic while maintaining reliable lock tracking through distributed coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local lock management where each processing device has its own lock manager that handles lock ownership locally. This local quality approach minimizes remote communications by resolving lock requests at the local level whenever possible, reducing the communication burden while maintaining accurate lock tracking through selective broadcasting only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If the number of processors increases, then parallel task execution increases, but the number of locks and management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparallel task executionVSAvoidlock management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the lock management system into independent lock managers at each processing device, allowing parallel task execution to scale with processor count without proportionally increasing central management complexity. Each lock manager operates semi-autonomously, managing locks locally while participating in distributed coordination only when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables each processing device to self-manage its lock ownership through local lock managers that automatically track and communicate lock state changes. This self-service approach reduces the coordination overhead that would otherwise scale linearly with processor count, as each node independently manages its own lock state while maintaining system-wide consistency through selective broadcasting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Stability of the object's composition

If lock ownership is broadcast to all lock managers, then lock state consistency is maintained, but network congestion increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelock state consistencyVSAvoidnetwork traffic
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements selective broadcasting where lock state changes are communicated only to relevant lock managers rather than universally to all. This local quality approach maintains lock state consistency by targeting communications only to nodes that need to know about the state change, reducing unnecessary network traffic while preserving system-wide consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the traditional broadcasting model by having lock managers pull state information on demand or receive targeted notifications only when relevant, rather than pushing updates to all nodes continuously. This inversion reduces network traffic by eliminating redundant communications to nodes that don't need the information, while maintaining consistency through selective information distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS11397625B2Lock manager for multi-core architectures
Publication Date: 2022.07.26 COMMISSARIAT A LENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES
  • US11397625B2 patent drawing
  • US11397625B2 patent drawing
  • US11397625B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-core architecture including: a plurality of processing devices, each processing device including a single processor or a cluster of processors; and a lock manager associated with each processing device, each lock manager being configured to: store a first data value indicating of whether or not it currently owns a first lock, the first lock authorizing access to a resource; and permit an owner of the first lock to be determined by one or more lock managers by broadcasting, over an interconnection network to each of the other lock managers, at least one message.