Decentralized Peripheral Simulation via Interface Module Software

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing decentralized peripherals require separate simulation assemblies and hardware configuration adjustments for simulation purposes, complicating the testing and simulation of automation facilities.

Innovation Solution

Implementing simulation functions directly within the decentralized peripheral's interface module using a programmable element, allowing seamless switching between real and simulation modes via downloadable software settings, utilizing simulation scripts and basic components like ramp functions and delay elements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If separate simulation assemblies are used to simulate decentralized peripheral behavior, then simulation capability is provided, but hardware configuration must be adjusted and device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation capabilityVSAvoidhardware configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the simulation functionality directly into the decentralized peripheral's interface module by implementing a simulation mode that can be activated via a software setting. This eliminates the need for separate simulation assemblies and reduces hardware configuration complexity, as the same physical device serves both real operation and simulation purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The decentralized peripheral is designed to perform multiple functions: it can operate in real operation mode with field devices and in simulation mode generating simulated process input values. This multi-functionality is achieved through a programmable element that can be configured via software, allowing the device to adapt its behavior based on the selected mode without requiring hardware changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If separate simulation assemblies are used for testing, then simulation functions are provided, but the number of components and hardware adjustments increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting capabilityVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The simulation functions are merged into the existing decentralized peripheral structure. The interface module contains a programmable element that can execute simulation routines, eliminating the need for separate simulation assemblies and reducing the total number of components in the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The simulation mode creates a virtual copy of the decentralized peripheral's behavior through software. Instead of using physical simulation assemblies that replicate hardware, the system uses a software-based simulation that generates realistic process input values, reducing component count while maintaining testing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If hardware configuration is adjusted for simulation, then simulation can be performed, but switching between real and simulation modes becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation operationVSAvoidmode switching
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic mode switching through software configuration rather than fixed hardware settings. The programmable element in the interface module can be reconfigured via downloadable software settings to switch between real operation mode and simulation mode, allowing flexible and easy transitions without physical hardware adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The transition between real and simulation modes is achieved by changing software parameters and settings rather than hardware configuration. The programmable element responds to different operational parameters defined in software, enabling easy mode switching through parameter adjustment instead of physical reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10509382B2Decentralized peripheral with which simulation functions are implemented in an existing component of an automation facility
Publication Date: 2019.12.17 SIEMENS AG
  • US10509382B2 patent drawing
  • US10509382B2 patent drawing
  • US10509382B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A decentralized peripheral having process input and process output modules which, in a process control mode of operation, interact with field devices connected to these modules, and having an interface module in which a process image is stored, wherein in the process control mode of operation the process input modules write process input values for processing via an automation device connected to the decentralized peripheral into the process image, and the automation device writes process output values for processing via the process output modules into the process image such that as real a behavior as possible of this decentralized peripheral can be simulated.