Decentralized Production Task Allocation for Flexible Plant Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Centralized control of production systems in manufacturing and assembly processes makes it complex to handle participant unavailability or integration of new participants, requiring central system intervention for task distribution and management.

Innovation Solution

A decentralized method where participants with computing units and electromagnetic wave transmission capabilities identify and offer tasks within their skill spectrum, allowing autonomous distribution and management without central control, enabling flexible organization and addition of new participants.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If centralized control is used to manage production tasks, then task coordination is achieved, but system flexibility and adaptability deteriorate when participants become unavailable or new participants are integrated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask coordinationVSAvoidsystem flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized control function is segmented and distributed to individual production participants. Each participant autonomously manages its own tasks and communicates directly with others, eliminating the single-point control bottleneck. This segmentation enables the system to adapt flexibly to participant availability changes while maintaining task coordination through decentralized peer-to-peer interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Production participants are empowered to autonomously identify available tasks, assess their own capability to perform them, and independently accept or reject tasks without central intervention. This self-service mechanism allows the system to dynamically adapt to changing participant availability and integrate new participants automatically, while still achieving coordinated task completion through individual autonomous decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If centralized system intervenes to redistribute tasks when participants are unavailable, then task completion is maintained, but system complexity and control requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

When a participant becomes unavailable, the system does not require centralized intervention for task redistribution. Instead, remaining participants autonomously detect the unavailable participant's tasks through direct communication and independently decide whether to accept them based on their own capability assessment. This self-service approach maintains task completion while eliminating the need for complex centralized control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Participants continuously exchange information about their availability, capabilities, and current task status through direct communication. This feedback mechanism enables automatic task redistribution when participants become unavailable, as remaining participants receive real-time information and independently adjust their task assignments, maintaining productivity without complex centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Stability of the object's composition

If new participants are integrated through central planning, then system organization is maintained, but integration time and system adaptability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem organizationVSAvoidintegration speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

New participants integrate into the system autonomously by directly communicating with existing participants to identify and accept available tasks based on their capabilities. This self-service integration process eliminates the need for centralized planning and approval, enabling rapid system adaptation while maintaining organizational stability through consistent peer-to-peer interaction protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows dynamic integration of new participants without disrupting existing organizational structures. New participants can join at any time and immediately begin accepting tasks through direct communication with the production environment, enabling the system to adapt dynamically to changing workforce availability while maintaining stable task coordination through established communication protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240261966A1Method for the decentralised operation of a production plant for manufacturing, producing and/or assembling products and/or goods, and a production plant that can be operated according to such a method
Publication Date: 2024.08.08 SCHWABISCHE WERKZEUGMASCHINEN GMBH
  • US20240261966A1 patent drawing
  • US20240261966A1 patent drawing
  • US20240261966A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for decentralised operation of a production system for producing, manufacturing and/or assembling products and/or goods, which includes at least three participants in a production environment, in which each participant includes a computing unit, in which a skill spectrum can be detected by the respective participant, and wherein each participant comprises a transmitting and receiving unit for transmitting and receiving electromagnetic waves.