Decentralized Train Control via On-Board Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional Communication Based Train Control (CBTC) systems are outdated and inefficient, requiring centralized control facilities and relying on trackside infrastructure, which limits autonomy and increases costs and maintenance needs, while existing solutions either require central memory storage or lack volatile memory on RFID tags.

Innovation Solution

The Acorn system employs on-board processing and RFID tags with volatile memory to enable autonomous train operation, reducing trackside infrastructure by using parallel processors and RFID tags to communicate and store train data, allowing trains to operate independently with a decentralized architecture and open protocol compatibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If centralized control facilities and trackside infrastructure are used in traditional CBTC systems, then train control and monitoring can be achieved, but system complexity, installation cost, and maintenance needs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrain control reliabilityVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the centralized control architecture into distributed on-board units (OBUs) in each train. Each OBU independently processes train control functions, eliminating the need for complex centralized control facilities and trackside infrastructure while maintaining reliable train control through autonomous decision-making at each train.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each train equipped with an OBU performs self-control and self-monitoring functions. The OBU autonomously determines train position, speed, and control commands without requiring continuous intervention from centralized control facilities, thereby reducing system complexity while ensuring reliable operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of information

If centralized memory storage is used for train activities, then data can be stored and retrieved, but communication overhead and processing delays increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrain activity data storageVSAvoidcommunication and processing delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent distributes memory storage functionality to each train's OBU rather than using centralized storage. Each OBU maintains local volatile memory that stores train activity data, eliminating the need for continuous communication with centralized storage systems and reducing processing delays while preventing data loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The OBU pre-loads necessary track and route data into volatile memory before train operations begin. This preliminary action ensures that all required information is immediately available for rapid processing during train operations, eliminating communication delays while maintaining complete information availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional CBTC system architecture is maintained, then existing infrastructure can be utilized, but autonomy and operational efficiency are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem upgrade flexibilityVSAvoidtrain operational autonomy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic architecture where each OBU can independently operate with full autonomous capabilities. This dynamic distribution of intelligence allows trains to adapt to various operating conditions and scenarios autonomously, significantly enhancing operational autonomy while maintaining flexibility for system upgrades and modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10850753B2Wireless train management system
Publication Date: 2020.12.01 ACORN TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC
  • US10850753B2 patent drawing
  • US10850753B2 patent drawing
  • US10850753B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robust system processor comprising three parallel processors, each configured to process in parallel an input and emit an output; and a reconciler that compares the three outputs, determines whether at least two of the outputs are equal, and if so validates the majority output and communicates the validated output via a network to at least one other system processor.