Polyphase Decimation FIR Filters With Differential Coefficients

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing polyphase decimation FIR filters face challenges in achieving low power consumption and small chip area due to high power dissipation from multiplication operations and overflow issues in integrator circuits.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a polyphase decimation FIR filter architecture that uses an integrator circuit with two's complement arithmetic and a polyphase FIR filter circuit with multiple independent multiplier accumulator circuits, employing differential coefficient methods to reduce coefficient precision and perform computations with modulo arithmetic, thereby minimizing power consumption and chip area.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If traditional multiplication operations are used in FIR filters, then filtering accuracy is maintained, but power dissipation increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower dissipationVSAvoidfiltering accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of coefficient precision by using differential coefficient methods to represent filter coefficients with reduced bit precision. This parameter change allows maintaining filtering accuracy while significantly reducing the power dissipation from multiplication operations, as lower precision coefficients require less computational energy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes traditional multiplication operations with a combination of addition and lookup table operations. By pre-computing and storing differential coefficient values in lookup tables, the power-intensive multiplication mechanism is replaced with simpler addition operations and memory access, reducing power dissipation while maintaining filtering performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If integrator word width is increased to prevent overflow, then computational accuracy is improved, but chip area increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational accuracyVSAvoidchip area
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies modulo arithmetic to create periodic wrapping of integrator values. Instead of continuously increasing word width to prevent overflow, the system uses periodic modulo operations that wrap values within a fixed range, preventing overflow while maintaining a constant, smaller chip area for the integrator circuit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of arithmetic operation type by using modulo arithmetic instead of standard addition. This parameter change allows the integrator to operate with fixed, smaller word width while preventing overflow through periodic wrapping, thereby reducing chip area while maintaining computational accuracy within the modulo range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If coefficient precision is reduced to lower power consumption, then power dissipation decreases, but filtering performance degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower dissipationVSAvoidfiltering performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces differential coefficients as an intermediary representation. Instead of using full-precision coefficients directly in multiplication, the system uses differential coefficients (differences between consecutive coefficients) which have lower precision requirements. This intermediary representation maintains filtering performance while enabling lower power consumption operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the coefficient representation into differential components. By representing coefficients as differences between adjacent values, the system creates a segmented structure where each differential coefficient requires fewer bits. This segmentation allows reduced precision operations while maintaining the overall filtering characteristics through the cumulative effect of differential terms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Measurement precision

If standard FIR filter structure is used, then filtering accuracy is maintained, but device complexity and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltering accuracyVSAvoidfilter structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the multiplication and accumulation operations into a unified multiplier-accumulator structure that operates with reduced precision coefficients. By combining these operations and using differential coefficient representation, the system reduces device complexity while maintaining filtering accuracy, as the merged structure with lower precision requirements is simpler than traditional separate multiplication and addition stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10050606B2Decimation FIR filters and methods
Publication Date: 2018.08.14 STMICROELECTRONICS INT NV
  • US10050606B2 patent drawing
  • US10050606B2 patent drawing
  • US10050606B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A polyphase decimation FIR filter apparatus including a modulo integrator circuit configured to integrate input samples and to provide integrated input samples; and a polyphase FIR filter circuit configured to process the integrated input samples, the polyphase FIR filter circuit including a plurality of multiplier accumulator circuits, each configured to accumulate products of coefficients and respective integrated signal samples, wherein each of the multiplier accumulator circuits receives a subset of FIR filter coefficients, wherein the FIR filter coefficients are derived as the nth difference of original filter coefficients, where n is a number of integrators in the integrator circuit, and wherein the FIR filter circuit is configured to perform computation operations with modulo arithmetic.