Decision Feedback Equalizer With Constrained Tap Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing communications methods and systems are overly power hungry and spectrally inefficient, failing to effectively address inter-symbol interference and non-linearity in communication channels.

Innovation Solution

A decision feedback equalizer system is implemented, comprising a mapper, pulse shaping filter, timing pilot insertion, transmitter and receiver front-ends, and an equalization and sequence estimation circuit, which uses partial response pulse shaping and non-linearity compensation to optimize symbol transmission and reception, reducing complexity and improving spectral efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional communications methods are used, then system implementation is straightforward, but spectral efficiency is poor and power consumption is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The equalization function is segmented into feed-forward equalizer (FFE) for inter-symbol interference mitigation and decision feedback equalizer (DFE) for residual interference cancellation. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, achieving high spectral efficiency through specialized processing while maintaining manageable overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The equalizer coefficients are dynamically adapted using training sequences and decision-directed modes. The system transitions between training mode (using known sequences for coefficient initialization) and decision-directed mode (using detected symbols for continuous refinement), enabling the system to achieve optimal performance adaptively without requiring complex manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If equalization processing is enhanced to mitigate inter-symbol interference, then bit-error rate performance improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebit-error rate performanceVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feed-forward equalizer performs preliminary equalization by mitigating inter-symbol interference from previous symbols before the decision feedback equalizer processes the signal. Training sequences are transmitted beforehand to initialize equalizer coefficients, establishing a foundation for accurate symbol detection without requiring complex real-time adaptive processing during data transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The decision feedback equalizer uses feedback from previously detected symbols to cancel residual inter-symbol interference. The DFE compares detected symbols with expected values and uses the error to adjust coefficients, creating a self-correcting mechanism that improves reliability through iterative refinement without proportionally increasing computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If partial response pulse shaping is used to increase spectral efficiency, then bandwidth utilization improves, but tolerance to channel non-linearity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth utilizationVSAvoidsensitivity to channel non-linearity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs partial response pulse shaping with controlled ISI characteristics, changing the temporal parameters of the pulse waveform to achieve spectral efficiency. By carefully designing the pulse response to have specific zero-crossing points and controlled interference patterns, the system maximizes bandwidth utilization while the equalizer compensates for the introduced sensitivity to non-linearity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system intentionally introduces controlled inter-symbol interference through partial response signaling, converting what would normally be a harmful effect into a beneficial structure. The predictable ISI pattern from partial response shaping allows the decision feedback equalizer to systematically cancel interference, transforming the vulnerability to non-linearity into a manageable characteristic that enables higher spectral efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS8665941B1Decision feedback equalizer for highly spectrally efficient communications
Publication Date: 2014.03.04 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD
  • US8665941B1 patent drawing
  • US8665941B1 patent drawing
  • US8665941B1 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more embodiments describe a decision feedback equalizer for highly spectrally efficient communications. A method may be performed in a decision feedback equalizer (DFE). The method may include initializing values of tap coefficients of the DFE based on values of tap coefficients of a partial response filter through which said transmitted symbols passed en route to said sequence estimation circuit. The method may include receiving estimates of transmitted symbols from a sequence estimation circuit, and receiving an error signal that is generated based on an estimated partial response signal output by the sequence estimation circuit. The method may include updating values of tap coefficients of the DFE based on the error signal and the estimates of transmitted symbols. The method may include generating one or more constraints that restrict the impact of the error signal on the updating of the values of the tap coefficients of the DFE.