Multi-Attribute Decision Interface with Priority Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current user interfaces for selecting optimal items from multi-attribute data objects often lack intuitive decision aids, as they only allow sorting by a single attribute, failing to account for user preferences and attribute precedence, which limits the ability to quickly identify the most suitable item.

Innovation Solution

The system provides a user interface that allows users to designate attribute precedence and apply ranking and filtering rules, aligning data objects and attributes in proximity to a prime area based on user preferences, enabling intuitive selection of optimal items by leveraging cultural and language-based prime areas within the interface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If sorting is limited to a single attribute, then the interface remains simple and easy to operate, but the ability to identify optimal items based on multiple attributes and user preferences is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface simplicityVSAvoiditem selection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the sorting functionality by allowing users to divide multiple attributes into different priority levels (primary, secondary, tertiary sorting attributes). This segmentation enables complex multi-criteria sorting while maintaining interface simplicity, as users can systematically organize their preferences across multiple attributes rather than being overwhelmed by a single complex sorting mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds temporal dimension to the sorting process by introducing time-based sorting options (e.g., sorting by recency, duration, or time-related attributes). This dimensional expansion allows users to evaluate items across multiple dimensions including traditional attributes and time-related criteria, enhancing decision-making without complicating the core interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If multiple sorting attributes are implemented, then the ability to identify optimal items improves, but the interface complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem selection efficiencyVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allowing users to assign different importance weights to different attributes based on their specific needs. Rather than treating all attributes uniformly, the system enables localized optimization where critical attributes receive higher sorting priority while less important attributes are weighted lower, creating a tailored sorting experience that improves efficiency without requiring complex interface changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by providing default sorting configurations and pre-defined attribute hierarchies that are established in advance. Users can start with these pre-configured sorting rules and only adjust them when necessary, reducing the perceived interface complexity while maintaining the capability for sophisticated multi-attribute sorting when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If attribute precedence and ranking rules are applied, then decision-making accuracy improves, but the time required to configure sorting criteria increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision accuracyVSAvoidconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling users to automatically import their preference hierarchies and attribute weightings from existing profiles, historical behavior data, or integrated preference management systems. This self-service approach allows the system to automatically configure appropriate sorting criteria based on user characteristics, reducing manual configuration time while maintaining high decision accuracy through personalized sorting rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms that learn from user interactions with sorted results. When users adjust sorting criteria or repeatedly select items from certain positions in sorted lists, the system uses this feedback to automatically refine and optimize sorting configurations, reducing the need for manual re-configuration while improving decision accuracy over time through adaptive learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9009617B2Decision aiding user interfaces
Publication Date: 2015.04.14 SAP SE
  • US9009617B2 patent drawing
  • US9009617B2 patent drawing
  • US9009617B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments include at least one of a system, method, and software providing at least one user interface allowing a user to rapidly choose an optimal item, as represented by multi-attribute data objects, among a set of comparable items. One example method embodiment includes receiving a dataset having a plurality of data objects with a plurality of data object attributes. The method further includes generating a view of the data objects within a user interface on a display device. Such a view may include a representation of at least a subset of the plurality of data objects along a first axis with data objects positioned in proximity to a first pole of the first axis relative to importance of the data objects according to data object attribute criterion. The view may also include a representation of data object attributes including at least two designated as data object attribute criterion.