Decision-Making Engine Modules for Structured Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack an integrated, end-to-end solution for effective decision-making, failing to provide a standardized process that can be scaled across organizations and often struggle to link choices with specific goals or values, leading to inefficient and timely decision-making processes.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based platform with a decision-making engine that integrates cognitive modules for end-to-end decision-making, interacting with internal and external stakeholders, and utilizing AI to assist users in refining problem statements, analyzing data, brainstorming solutions, and calculating quantitative data to support informed decision-making.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional decision-making methods are used, then individuals can make decisions based on sporadic thoughts and immediate reactions, but the decision-making process lacks structure and efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of decision-makingVSAvoiddecision-making efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The decision-making process is divided into distinct sequential stages: problem identification, data collection, analysis, solution generation, evaluation, and decision implementation. Each stage is handled by specialized cognitive modules that process information systematically, transforming chaotic sporadic thoughts into structured analytical steps while maintaining ease of use through automated guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining decision frameworks, pre-collecting relevant data from multiple sources, and pre-establishing evaluation criteria before the actual decision-making moment. This preparation enables rapid, efficient decisions by having all necessary tools and information ready in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If motivational speakers and retreats are used to enhance thinking and teamwork, then positive reinforcement is provided, but the activities are generally unrelated to specific company-related topics and do not provide structured decision-making processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to company-specific issuesVSAvoidcomplexity of decision-making process
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides a universal decision-making framework that can be applied across any company, industry, or organizational level. The same core modules handle diverse problems from strategic planning to operational decisions, making the system adaptable to any specific company issue without requiring separate specialized training or activities for each topic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system acts as an intermediary between raw company-specific problems and structured solutions. It translates complex, organization-specific issues into standardized decision frameworks that can be systematically processed, then generates tailored recommendations that address the specific company context while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of time

If decisions are based on desire for instant gratification and convenience, then quick decisions are made, but judgment quality and character development are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making timeVSAvoidquality of judgment
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous useful action by operating through multiple cognitive modules that work simultaneously and sequentially: data collection continues in the background, analysis modules process information continuously, and evaluation modules constantly compare options against established criteria. This continuous processing enables rapid decisions with high judgment quality by having multiple analytical threads running concurrently rather than sequentially.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where decisions are continuously monitored, outcomes are measured against predicted results, and lessons are fed back into the system to refine future decision-making. This feedback loop ensures that quick decisions are made with improving accuracy over time, as the system learns from past performance and adjusts its analytical frameworks accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12020194B2System and method for assisting entities in making decisions
Publication Date: 2024.06.25 GUPTA MAYANK
  • US12020194B2 patent drawing
  • US12020194B2 patent drawing
  • US12020194B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for assisting entities or users to make decisions is disclosed. The user access the decision-making engine (MG Case composite) for end-to-end decision-making process. The system comprises a computing device (physical or on the cloud) having a processor and a memory, and a database. The engine comprises multiple modules such as case open, structure, MG Case matrix, brainstorming, problem solving, data analysis, speed math, and case end along with drive and alignment, integration and transition, and insights and impacts. The system is an integrated system and the modules are executed by the processor to perform an operation that draws on modules as needed. The decision-making engine interacts with internal and external facets of an organization, including users, various communication systems, ERPs, databases, etc. to execute various tasks related to decision making such as gathering data and driving the decision-making process through the organization or with the user.