Decision Model Meta-Parameter Training via Perturbation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high cost and requirement for high-quality training data in secondary training of AI models make it impractical for ordinary users to perform model training, limiting the efficiency and accessibility of model adaptation for specific tasks.

Innovation Solution

The method involves training a decision-making model in a primary environment using perturbation parameters and observation data, allowing the model to adapt without pre-prepared training data, and then applying the learned meta-parameters to a secondary environment for task-specific decisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If secondary training is performed with high-quality training data, then model accuracy for specific tasks is improved, but training cost and data preparation complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoiddata preparation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs pre-training on a large-scale dataset to obtain an initial model before secondary training. This preliminary action enables the model to learn general features and patterns, reducing the need for extensive high-quality task-specific training data while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses data augmentation techniques to generate synthetic training data that mimics real-world data distributions. This copying approach creates additional training samples without requiring manual data collection and annotation, reducing data preparation complexity while maintaining model accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If secondary training is performed with high-quality training data, then model accuracy for specific tasks is improved, but training time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs pre-training on a large-scale dataset to obtain an initial model before secondary training. This preliminary action enables the model to learn general features and patterns, reducing the need for extensive high-quality task-specific training data while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adjusts training parameters such as learning rate, batch size, and number of epochs based on the pre-trained model's performance. This dynamic parameter adjustment optimizes the secondary training process, reducing training time while maintaining or improving model accuracy for specific tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional secondary training is performed, then model specialization for specific tasks is achieved, but user accessibility and ease of operation decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel specializationVSAvoiduser accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated model selection and training parameter optimization that requires minimal user intervention. The system automatically selects appropriate pre-trained models and adjusts training parameters based on the task requirements, enabling ordinary users to perform model adaptation without expert knowledge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a unified training framework that can adapt multiple pre-trained models to various tasks using the same secondary training process. This universal approach allows a single system to serve multiple functions and task types, improving user accessibility while maintaining model specialization capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20230032324A1Method for training decision-making model parameter, decision determination method, electronic device, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2023.02.02 BEIJING BAIDU NETCOM SCI & TECH CO LTD
  • US20230032324A1 patent drawing
  • US20230032324A1 patent drawing
  • US20230032324A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for training a decision-making model parameter, a decision determination method, an electronic device, and a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium are provided. In the method, a perturbation parameter is generated according to a meta-parameter, and first observation information of a primary training environment is acquired based on the perturbation parameter. According to the first observation information, an evaluation parameter of the perturbation parameter is determined. According to the perturbation parameter and the evaluation parameter thereof, an updated meta-parameter is generated. The updated meta-parameter is determined as a target meta-parameter, when it is determined, according to the meta-parameter and the updated meta-parameter, that a condition for stopping primary training is met. According to the target meta-parameter, a target memory parameter corresponding to a secondary training task is determined, where the target memory parameter and the target meta-parameter are used to make a decision corresponding to a prediction task.