Decision Support Tool With Interactive Sliders For Weighting Criteria

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Complex decisions involving multiple criteria are often difficult to weigh and calculate consistently, leading to user confusion and potential errors in decision-making.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that collects data from multiple sources, uses interactive sliders to assign relative weighting factors to default criteria, and executes an algorithm to determine a recommended action, allowing users to adjust criteria weights and recalculate the action based on user inputs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple criteria are used to evaluate requests, then decision accuracy is improved, but decision complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision accuracyVSAvoiddecision complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary decision support system that includes a criteria manager, weight manager, and score manager. These intermediary components automatically evaluate requests against multiple criteria and compute weighted scores, mediating between the complex multi-criteria evaluation process and the user's decision-making process. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining high decision accuracy through comprehensive criteria evaluation while reducing the perceived complexity for users through automated processing and intuitive presentation of results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If manual weighting of criteria is allowed, then user control is improved, but calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoidcalculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service mechanisms where the system automatically performs weight normalization, score calculation, and criterion evaluation based on user-defined weights. The weight manager automatically normalizes weights to ensure they sum to 100%, and the score manager automatically computes weighted scores for each criterion. This allows users to exercise control by simply setting weights without needing to understand or manually perform the complex calculations, thereby improving ease of operation while managing calculation complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Speed

If real-time recalculation is implemented, then responsiveness is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveresponsivenessVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-calculating and storing criterion scores, weight normalizations, and evaluation rules before they are needed for actual decision-making. The system maintains a library of pre-processed criterion evaluations that can be quickly retrieved and combined during real-time interactions. When users adjust weights or add new requests, the system performs incremental updates rather than complete recalculations, leveraging the pre-computed data to achieve fast responsiveness while minimizing actual processing time during user interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10949754B2Decision support tool with interactive sliders
Publication Date: 2021.03.16 SAP PORTALS ISRAEL
  • US10949754B2 patent drawing
  • US10949754B2 patent drawing
  • US10949754B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure generally describes methods, software, and systems, including a method for providing a recommended action. Data that is associated with requests and that is used in supporting actions made regarding the requests is collected from multiple sources. Default criteria based on the data and supporting a determination of a recommended action responsive to the given request is provided for presentation in the user interface. The user interface includes interactive sliders, each interactive slider being associated with a criterion and having a default slider position associated with a relative weighting factor for the criterion. An algorithm is executed that is associated with a request type of the given request. Absolute weights are assigned to the default criteria using the relative weighting factors. The given request is evaluated using the default criteria and the absolute weights to determine the recommended action, which is provided for presentation in the user interface.