Decision Tree Training Using Database System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Machine learning techniques like decision trees are resource-intensive and computationally costly due to the need for large amounts of training data and processing power, making them time-consuming for classification or regression tasks.

Innovation Solution

A method is described for training decision trees using a database system by selecting subsets of features and data, calculating information gain, and generating decision nodes in parallel, which reduces computational requirements and accelerates the training process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional decision tree training methods are used with large datasets and multiple features, then classification accuracy is improved, but computational cost and training time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the training process into multiple parallel workers that each handle subsets of features and data. Each worker independently calculates information gain for assigned features, allowing the overall training process to be segmented into concurrent tasks that reduce total training time while maintaining classification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent calculates information gain for all features but selectively uses only the top-k features with highest information gain for actual decision node creation. This partial action approach computes more than needed (all features) but applies only the most valuable subset, reducing the effective computational burden while preserving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Measurement precision

If traditional decision tree training methods are used with large datasets and multiple features, then classification accuracy is improved, but computational resources and processing power requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational power
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The training workload is segmented across multiple worker processes, each responsible for calculating information gain for specific feature subsets. This segmentation distributes computational power requirements across multiple smaller tasks that can be executed in parallel, reducing the peak computational power needed by any single process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system computes information gain for all features but only utilizes the top-k features for building decision nodes. This selective application of computational effort reduces the overall computational power required while maintaining the accuracy benefits of comprehensive feature analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If information gain is calculated for all features using traditional methods, then model accuracy is improved, but the complexity of the training process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidtraining process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex training process is segmented into distinct worker tasks, each handling specific feature calculations. This segmentation simplifies the overall process by breaking it into manageable, independent units that can be coordinated through a manager-worker architecture, reducing the perceived complexity while maintaining comprehensive feature analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs complete information gain calculation for all features but only applies the top-k results to decision node creation. This partial application simplifies the final model construction phase while retaining the accuracy benefits of comprehensive feature evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11934931B2Decision tree training using a database system
Publication Date: 2024.03.19 SHAPE SECURITY INC
  • US11934931B2 patent drawing
  • US11934931B2 patent drawing
  • US11934931B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an embodiment, a computer-implemented method for training a decision tree using a database system, the decision tree comprising a plurality nodes, comprises, by one or more computing devices: storing in a database input data for training the decision tree, the input data comprising a plurality of feature values corresponding to a plurality of features; generating a particular node of the plurality of decision nodes by: selecting a subset of the plurality of features and a subset of the input data; using one or more queries to the database system, for each feature of the subset of the plurality of features, calculating an information gain associated with the feature based on the subset of the input data; identifying a particular feature of the subset of the plurality of features associated with the highest information gain; associating the particular node with the particular feature, wherein the particular node causes the decision tree to branch based on the particular feature.