Decision Tree Data Analysis with Split-Set Effect Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional medical data analysis systems face challenges in predicting treatment effects due to overfitting and lack of interpretability in decision trees, particularly when dealing with individual patient variability.

Innovation Solution

A computer system that partitions data into subsets using a random forest of decision trees, evaluates intervention effects, and calculates scores for each branch to enhance prediction accuracy and interpretability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a decision tree is generated by partitioning a data set into two data sets with different applications to prevent overfitting, then prediction reliability is improved, but the structure becomes different with each training session leading to lack of consistency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoidstructure consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the data set into multiple subsets (first data set and second data set) for different purposes: one for searching branching conditions and another for evaluating intervention effects. This segmentation allows the system to maintain structure consistency while improving prediction reliability through rigorous validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by evaluating intervention effects using the second data set after generating branching conditions with the first data set. This feedback mechanism ensures that the decision tree structure remains consistent across training sessions while maintaining high prediction reliability through iterative validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If a random forest using a plurality of decision trees is used to predict treatment effect, then prediction accuracy is improved, but interpretability of prediction result is not ensured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidinterpretability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and presents only the most important branching conditions from the random forest model. By selecting and displaying key branches that contribute most to prediction accuracy, the system maintains high prediction accuracy while restoring interpretability by showing users the critical decision paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses visual presentation techniques to highlight important branches, making the complex random forest model interpretable. By visually distinguishing key branching conditions from less important ones, the system maintains prediction accuracy while enabling users to understand the model's decision-making process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250308660A1Computer system and data analysis method
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 HITACHI HIGH TECH CORP
  • US20250308660A1 patent drawing
  • US20250308660A1 patent drawing
  • US20250308660A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer system is accessibly connected to a database that stores data including values of a plurality of factors. The computer system repeatedly executes: first processing of partitioning an analysis data set including a plurality of pieces of data into a first data set and a second data set; second processing of searching, using the first data set, for a branching condition for partitioning the analysis data set into two groups, evaluating an intervention effect using the second data set, determining the branching condition to be used, and generating a decision tree that includes at least one branching condition and is used to predict an event; and third processing of calculating a score indicating quality of a branch of the decision tree for each of a plurality of decision trees. The computer system generates information for displaying the plurality of decision trees and the score.