Decision Tree Treatment Recommendation System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current data collection methodologies for therapeutic interventions, such as those for autism spectrum disorders, often rely on unstructured data that cannot be analyzed to derive insights from large populations, and inexperienced therapists struggle to integrate information from multiple assessments to formulate effective treatment plans.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a set of decision trees that provides treatment recommendations through a holistic assessment, including a user interface to receive responses, a processor to determine recommendations based on these responses, and anonymized data analysis to improve the accuracy and efficacy of treatment plans.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If unstructured data collection methodologies are used, then data collection is simple, but data analysis and insight derivation from large populations becomes impossible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata collection simplicityVSAvoiddata analysis capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments unstructured data into structured formats by organizing assessment responses into decision tree nodes and branches. Each assessment area (communication, behavior, social skills) is divided into specific prompts and response categories, transforming raw unstructured data into analyzable structured data while maintaining collection simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The decision tree assessment system acts as an intermediary between simple data collection and complex data analysis. It structures therapist notes and patient responses into a standardized format that can be processed by machine learning algorithms, enabling insight derivation from large populations while keeping the collection process straightforward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If inexperienced therapists provide treatment, then accessibility is improved, but ability to integrate information from multiple assessments deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapist accessibilityVSAvoidtreatment plan formulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically integrating information from multiple assessment decision trees and generating comprehensive treatment recommendations. The machine learning algorithm processes responses from communication, behavior, and social skills assessments to produce unified treatment plans, freeing therapists from manual integration tasks regardless of experience level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback by continuously analyzing assessment responses and updating treatment recommendations based on patient progress and response to interventions. This iterative feedback loop ensures that treatment plans remain reliable and effective, adapting to individual patient needs while maintaining consistency across multiple assessment areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If holistic assessment across multiple areas is implemented, then treatment recommendation accuracy is improved, but assessment complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment recommendation accuracyVSAvoidassessment structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The holistic assessment is segmented into distinct decision trees for different assessment areas (communication, behavior, social skills). Each decision tree handles a specific domain with its own prompts and response categories, making the overall complex assessment manageable through modular organization while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The decision tree framework provides universality by serving multiple functions: it structures assessment prompts, processes responses, identifies patterns across areas, and generates treatment recommendations. This multi-functional approach reduces overall system complexity by consolidating multiple assessment functions into a single unified framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If anonymized data from large populations is analyzed, then treatment recommendation efficacy is improved, but data privacy requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment plan efficacyVSAvoiddata privacy constraints
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and analyzes only the necessary information from patient data while removing personally identifiable information. By extracting clinical patterns and treatment responses from anonymized data, the system can analyze large populations for efficacy improvement without retaining or processing sensitive personal information, thus meeting privacy requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Anonymization serves as an intermediary between raw patient data and analysis. It transforms identifiable patient information into anonymized data that can be aggregated and analyzed for treatment efficacy while eliminating privacy risks. This intermediary layer enables large-scale population analysis without compromising data privacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20230326594A1Method for providing and updating treatment recommendations
Publication Date: 2023.10.12 SPRINGTIDE CHILD DEV INC
  • US20230326594A1 patent drawing
  • US20230326594A1 patent drawing
  • US20230326594A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus and method for providing treatment recommendations based on a holistic assessment including a set of decision trees is presented herein. The method may include receiving a first set of responses based on prompts within each decision tree of a set of decision trees, each decision tree of the set of decision trees corresponding to a different aspect of a human activity. The method may further include outputting the prompts within each decision tree of the set of decision trees, at least one prompt being outputted based on one or more responses in the first set of responses. The method may also include determining at least one treatment recommendation based on the first set of responses to the prompts outputted for the set of decision trees. The method may further include outputting the at least one treatment recommendation.