Decision Tree Model for Well Performance Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for predicting and optimizing the performance of oil and natural gas wells are limited by their inability to accurately account for dynamic factors and time-dependent features, leading to inefficiencies in well location, drilling costs, and operational safety.

Innovation Solution

A decision-tree-based model that incorporates both time-independent and time-dependent input features, trained on historical well production data, to predict and explain well performance, allowing for more accurate pre-drilling and post-drilling operations by identifying key factors influencing productivity, cost, and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional static parameter models are used for well performance prediction, then the model structure is simple, but the predictive accuracy is insufficient due to inability to account for dynamic factors and time-dependent features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms static parameter models into dynamic models by incorporating time-dependent features and operational data that evolve over time. The system uses historical operational data from multiple time points to capture dynamic well performance characteristics, enabling the model to adapt to changing conditions while maintaining predictive accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by using historical operational data and actual well performance outcomes to continuously refine and update the predictive model. The system learns from past performance patterns and uses this feedback to improve future predictions, addressing the complexity-accuracy tradeoff through iterative optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If more time-dependent features and operational data are incorporated into the model, then the predictive accuracy improves, but the data processing complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex dataset into distinct time-dependent features and time-independent parameters. By organizing operational data into structured time-series components and categorizing features by their temporal characteristics, the system simplifies the processing of complex multi-dimensional data while maintaining comprehensive predictive capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate processing layers that transform raw operational data into meaningful features before feeding them into the predictive model. These intermediary processing steps include data normalization, feature engineering, and temporal pattern extraction, which reduce the complexity of raw data while preserving the essential information needed for accurate predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If comprehensive well performance modeling is performed for both pre-drilling and post-drilling operations, then the versatility of the model increases, but the computational resources and processing time required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel versatilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary model training and feature extraction during off-peak periods using historical data, so that when actual prediction needs arise, the model is already prepared and can provide rapid predictions. This preliminary action reduces the processing time required during critical decision-making moments while maintaining comprehensive modeling capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts model parameters and complexity based on the specific prediction task and available data. For pre-drilling predictions, the model uses static parameters and geological data, while for post-drilling operations, it incorporates operational data with varying levels of detail, optimizing computational efficiency for each scenario while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20220083873A1Predictive Modeling of Well Performance Using Learning and Time-Series Techniques
Publication Date: 2022.03.17 NOVI LABS INC
  • US20220083873A1 patent drawing
  • US20220083873A1 patent drawing
  • US20220083873A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system may include persistent storage containing training data related to well production, wherein entries in the training data respectively include time-independent input feature values and time-dependent input feature values both mapped to ground-truth production values of corresponding wells at particular points in time, wherein the time-dependent input feature values include ground-truth production values of the corresponding wells at respectively earlier points in time. The system may also include one or more processors configured to: train a decision-tree-based model with the training data; provide, to the decision-tree-based model, new time-independent input feature values and new time-dependent input feature values for a well; and receive, from the decision-tree-based model, one or more predicted production values of the well, wherein the one or more predicted production values are generated by the decision-tree-based model based on its internal structure, the new time-independent input feature values, and the new time-dependent input feature values.