Deck-Level Shunting Circuitry for 3D Memory Scaling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As memory devices scale with increasing layers or decks above a substrate, the area required for substrate-based circuitry increases, leading to scaling limitations due to the limited substrate area that must support growing quantities of decks and associated circuitry.

Innovation Solution

Implementing deck selection and shunting circuitry, such as deck selection transistors and shunting transistors, distributed among the decks to leverage common substrate-based circuitry, allowing for shared logic or addressing signals and reducing the need for extensive substrate-based circuitry by moving decoding or addressing into decks above the substrate.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If substrate-based circuitry is used to support memory decks, then circuit functionality is achieved, but substrate area increases limiting scaling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory scaling capabilityVSAvoidsubstrate area
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent moves circuitry from the substrate plane to the vertical dimension by implementing deck selection and shunting circuitry distributed among decks above the substrate. This transitions the architecture from two-dimensional substrate-based circuitry to three-dimensional distributed circuitry, allowing memory scaling without proportional increases in substrate area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the circuitry by distributing deck selection and shunting circuitry across multiple decks rather than consolidating it on the substrate. Each deck contains its own circuitry, allowing independent operation and reducing the burden on substrate area while maintaining full circuit functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If more decks are added to increase memory capacity, then storage capacity improves, but substrate area requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory capacityVSAvoidsubstrate area
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables increased memory capacity by adding decks in the vertical dimension rather than expanding substrate area horizontally. Each additional deck contributes to storage capacity while the distributed circuitry architecture ensures that substrate area does not increase proportionally with the number of decks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements shared logic and addressing signals that can serve multiple decks simultaneously. This multi-functionality allows the same substrate-based circuitry to support an increasing number of decks, enabling memory capacity to scale without linear increases in substrate area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Area of stationary object

If deck selection and shunting circuitry are distributed among decks, then substrate area is reduced, but circuit complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate areaVSAvoidcircuit distribution complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments circuitry into modular deck-level units with standardized functions. Each deck contains similar circuitry elements (selection transistors, shunting transistors), which reduces the overall complexity by creating repeatable patterns rather than requiring unique complex circuit designs for each deck.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges deck selection and shunting functions into a unified distributed architecture where both functions are implemented at the deck level using similar transistor structures. This consolidation of functions into a standardized framework reduces complexity compared to having separate dedicated circuits for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11978493B2Deck-level shunting in a memory device
Publication Date: 2024.05.07 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US11978493B2 patent drawing
  • US11978493B2 patent drawing
  • US11978493B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for deck-level shunting in a memory device are described. A memory device may include memory arrays arranged in a stack of decks over a substrate, and a combination of deck selection circuitry and shunting circuitry may be distributed among the decks to leverage common substrate-based circuitry, such as logic or addressing circuitry. For example, each memory array of a stack may include a set of digit lines and deck selection circuitry, such as deck selection transistors or other switching circuitry, operable to couple the set of digit lines with a column decoder that may be shared among multiple decks. Each memory array of a stack also may include shunting circuitry, such as shunting transistors or other switching circuitry operable to couple the set of digit lines with a plate node, thereby equalizing a voltage across the memory cells of the respective memory array.