Decoder-Aware Video Encoding for Complexity-Constrained Playback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current data encoding methods do not consider the dynamic state of decoders, leading to potential decoding performance degradation and compromised playback quality if the decoding resources are insufficient.

Innovation Solution

Encoding data based on knowledge of the target decoder's current, past, and predicted states, using customized encoding schemes that match the available decoding resources and complexity constraints to optimize decoding performance and quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If encoding schemes are selected without considering decoder state, then encoding complexity is reduced and processing speed is improved, but decoding performance degrades and playback quality is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveencoding processing speedVSAvoiddecoding performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The encoder performs preliminary actions by predicting the future state of the decoder before encoding each frame. The system simulates decoder behavior in advance to estimate buffer occupancy and processing load, then uses this prediction to select appropriate encoding schemes that ensure successful decoding while maintaining efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by using the predicted decoder state to adjust encoding decisions. The encoder continuously monitors simulated decoder buffer occupancy and processing load, then feeds this information back into the encoding scheme selection process to dynamically adapt to decoder capabilities and prevent buffer overflow or underflow conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of manufacture

If minimum decoder requirements are specified, then device complexity is reduced and ease of manufacture is improved, but adaptability to different decoder capabilities is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoder implementation simplicityVSAvoiddecoder capability compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static minimum requirements to dynamic adaptation. The encoder dynamically adjusts its behavior based on real-time predictions of decoder state, allowing the same encoding system to adapt to various decoder capabilities without requiring different hardware implementations. This enables graceful degradation and optimized performance across diverse decoder platforms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes encoding parameters dynamically based on predicted decoder state. By adjusting encoding complexity, bitrate, and tool selection according to the simulated decoder buffer occupancy and processing load, the system achieves adaptability across different decoder capabilities while maintaining a single, relatively simple decoder implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If encoding complexity is increased to match decoder capabilities, then decoding quality is improved, but encoding processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding qualityVSAvoidencoding processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The encoder performs preliminary simulation of decoder behavior to determine the optimal encoding complexity level before actual encoding. By predicting how the decoder will handle different encoding schemes and estimating buffer occupancy in advance, the system identifies the highest quality encoding that can be successfully decoded within acceptable processing time, avoiding unnecessary complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial encoding complexity based on predicted decoder capabilities. Rather than always using maximum complexity encoding, the system selectively applies higher complexity only when the predicted decoder state indicates sufficient buffer occupancy and processing capacity, thereby achieving high quality output without consistently incurring maximum encoding processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS7969333B2Complexity-aware encoding
Publication Date: 2011.06.28 APPLE INC
  • US7969333B2 patent drawing
  • US7969333B2 patent drawing
  • US7969333B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for encoding data based at least in part upon an awareness of the decoding complexity of the encoded data and the ability of a target decoder to decode the encoded data are disclosed. In some embodiments, a set of data is encoded based at least in part upon a state of a target decoder to which the encoded set of data is to be provided. In some embodiments, a set of data is encoded based at least in part upon the states of multiple decoders to which the encoded set of data is to be provided.