Biological Interface Decoder Self-Training via Predictive Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current biological interface systems face challenges in accurately and rapidly training and re-training decoder functions, especially in unsupervised settings, due to difficulties in deriving desired control signals and providing accurate feedback without explicit instructions.

Innovation Solution

The method involves obtaining predictive signals from both subjects and environments, using a decoder function to produce output values for controlling devices, and re-training the decoder based on feedback signals and historical data, with adaptive re-training intervals and weighted combinations of new and past training data to improve accuracy and adaptability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If decoder functions are trained using traditional supervised methods with explicit instructions, then training accuracy can be achieved, but the system cannot operate in unsupervised settings and requires continuous human guidance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunsupervised operation capabilityVSAvoiddecoder training accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing the decoder to automatically re-train itself using predictive signals and feedback from device operations. The decoder function performs self-correction by comparing predicted outputs with actual device behavior, eliminating the need for continuous human supervision while maintaining training accuracy through autonomous adaptive learning mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the actual device output is compared with the predicted output from the decoder. This feedback loop enables the decoder to automatically adjust and re-train itself in unsupervised settings, using the discrepancy between predicted and actual signals as learning data to improve accuracy without human intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If the decoder function is frequently re-trained to adapt to changing conditions, then adaptability improves, but system complexity and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoder adaptabilityVSAvoidre-training system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by making the re-training process adaptive rather than static. The decoder automatically determines when re-training is necessary based on performance metrics and environmental changes, adjusting the re-training frequency and intensity dynamically. This reduces unnecessary computational overhead while maintaining high adaptability to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by adjusting decoder weights and parameters automatically during re-training based on new predictive signals and feedback data. This parameter adaptation allows the decoder to evolve with changing conditions without requiring complete re-training, reducing computational complexity while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If predictive signals are incorporated to guide decoder training, then training speed and accuracy improve, but the system requires additional sensors and signal processing components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoder training speedVSAvoidsignal processing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by designing the predictive signal processing framework to handle multiple types of signals (neural, physiological, environmental) through a unified processing architecture. This multi-functional approach allows the same signal processing components to work with different signal types, reducing overall system complexity while enabling fast and accurate decoder training through diverse predictive inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11755902B2Co-adaptation for learning and control of devices
Publication Date: 2023.09.12 THE CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY INC
  • US11755902B2 patent drawing
  • US11755902B2 patent drawing
  • US11755902B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of operating a biological interface is disclosed. The method may include obtaining an input physiological or neural signal from a subject, acquiring an input set of values from the input signal, obtaining a predictive signal from the subject or the environment, acquiring a predictive set of values from the predictive signal, training a decoder function in response to data from the predictive set of values, performing at least one calculation on the input set of values using the decoder function to produce an output set of values, and operating a device with the output set of values. A biological interface system is also disclosed. The biological interface system may contain an input signal sensor, an input signal processor, a predictive signal processor, a memory device storing data, and a system processor coupled to the memory device and configured to execute a decoder function.