Decomposition Pipe Mixing Member Reductant Deposit Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aftertreatment systems for internal combustion engines face issues with reductant material deposits in decomposition pipes, leading to reduced SCR efficiency, increased exhaust restriction, and excess ammonia concentration due to incomplete urea decomposition at specific temperature ranges.

Innovation Solution

The system incorporates a decomposition pipe with a flow restriction portion and a mixing member, where the reductant injector provides a spray that impinges on the mixing member, increasing exhaust velocity and turbulence, thereby preventing deposits by ensuring complete decomposition of urea before the exhaust reaches the NOx reduction catalyst.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If urea is injected into the exhaust stream for SCR, then NOx removal is achieved, but reductant material deposits form on decomposition pipe surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSCR efficiencyVSAvoidreductant material deposits
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by ensuring complete urea decomposition occurs in the decomposition pipe before the exhaust reaches the NOx reduction catalyst. The flow restriction portion creates conditions (increased velocity, turbulence, extended residence time) that guarantee full decomposition of urea into ammonia and gaseous products, preventing any undecomposed urea from depositing on downstream surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key parameters in the decomposition pipe: introducing a flow restriction portion that increases exhaust gas velocity, creating turbulence to enhance heat and mass transfer, and extending the residence time. These parameter changes ensure complete urea decomposition while preventing deposit formation on pipe surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If decomposition pipe length is increased to provide residence time, then urea decomposition is improved, but exhaust restriction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveurea decomposition completenessVSAvoidexhaust restriction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by placing a flow restriction portion at a specific location within the decomposition pipe. This localized restriction creates high velocity and turbulence only in the critical decomposition zone, providing sufficient residence time for complete urea decomposition without requiring the entire pipe to be lengthy, thus minimizing overall exhaust restriction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The flow restriction portion is positioned upstream of the NOx reduction catalyst to ensure complete urea decomposition occurs before the exhaust enters the catalyst. This preliminary action prevents undecomposed urea from reaching the catalyst, eliminating the need for excessively long pipe lengths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If reductant spray is injected to improve dispersion, then SCR efficiency is enhanced, but deposit formation on mixing member surfaces increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereductant dispersion uniformityVSAvoiddeposits on mixing member
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent ensures complete urea decomposition occurs in the decomposition pipe before the exhaust reaches the NOx reduction catalyst. The flow restriction portion creates conditions (high velocity, turbulence, extended residence time) that guarantee full decomposition of urea into ammonia and gaseous products, preventing any undecomposed urea from depositing on downstream surfaces including the mixing member.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The flow restriction portion changes the flow parameters by increasing velocity and creating turbulence, which enhances heat and mass transfer. These parameter changes ensure complete urea decomposition while preventing deposit formation on the mixing member and other pipe surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces the likelihood of reductant deposits on internal surfaces, enhances reductant dispersion, and maintains efficient SCR operation by ensuring complete urea decomposition, thus preventing exhaust restriction and ammonia excess.

Implementation Method 1

heat from the exhaust gas evaporates water from the urea and provides the activation energy needed to chemically decompose the urea

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

heat from the exhaust gas evaporates water from the urea and provides the activation energy needed to chemically decompose the urea

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal decomposition: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 3

a mixing device to improve the uniformity of the reductant dispersion in the exhaust gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentUS9341097B2Reductant material deposit reduction in exhaust aftertreatment systems
Publication Date: 2016.05.17 CUMMINS INC
  • US9341097B2 patent drawing
  • US9341097B2 patent drawing
  • US9341097B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one non-limiting embodiment, an apparatus for treating exhaust includes a reductant injector, an aftertreatment component including a NOx reduction catalyst, and a pathway for directing exhaust to the aftertreatment component. The pathway includes a constriction zone within which is positioned a mixing member. The constriction zone begins downstream of the reductant injector and upstream from the aftertreatment component. However, other embodiments, forms and applications are also envisioned.