Aircraft Decompression Panel Assembly with Annular Baffles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing decompression panels in aircraft are heavy, require large volumes for deployment, and suffer from noise transmission, dust accumulation, and potential passenger abuse due to louvered configurations and insecure baffle attachments.

Innovation Solution

A decompression panel assembly featuring annular baffle elements continuously attached to panels via adhesive, forming air-tight seals and hidden louver members to minimize noise and dust visibility, with designed fracture zones for airflow during decompression events, reducing weight and cost.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If solid panels with movable decompression panels are used, then airflow restriction in standard operation is achieved, but weight increases and deployment volume requirement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairflow restrictionVSAvoiddecompression panel weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The decompression panel is segmented into multiple independent openings rather than a single solid panel. Each opening can independently restrict or allow airflow, providing the same functional reliability as a solid panel while significantly reducing weight and deployment volume requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the decompression panel have different properties - the openings provide airflow restriction when closed, while the baffle elements provide noise attenuation when deployed. This local differentiation allows the panel to achieve multiple functions without requiring a solid panel structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If louvered configurations are used, then airflow restriction is achieved, but dust accumulation surface increases and passenger abuse potential increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairflow restrictionVSAvoiddust accumulation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful aspects of louvered configurations (exposed surfaces for dust accumulation and abuse) are extracted and removed by covering them with aesthetic panel surfaces. The functional airflow restriction is maintained through the baffle element mechanism, while the visual and protective surfaces are provided by the panel materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of manufacture

If baffle is connected to grille at discrete points, then assembly simplicity is maintained, but noise transmission increases due to resonance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebaffle assemblyVSAvoidnoise transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The baffle elements are continuously attached to the panel surfaces rather than being discrete point connections. This continuous attachment merges the baffle and panel into a unified structure that effectively blocks noise transmission while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through the use of adhesive materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If electronically connected or pressure sensitive mechanical latch systems are used, then decompression function is achieved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecompression functionVSAvoidlatch system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The decompression panel operates autonomously without requiring external electronic or mechanical latch systems. The pressure differential automatically drives the baffle elements to open or close the openings as needed, making the system self-regulating and eliminating complex control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Electronic and complex mechanical latch systems are replaced with a simpler pressure-driven mechanical mechanism. The pressure differential directly acts on the baffle elements to control airflow, substituting complex control systems with a direct physical response to pressure changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a lightweight, cost-effective, and aesthetically improved decompression panel assembly that effectively manages airflow and noise while minimizing passenger access and dust accumulation, ensuring efficient pressure equalization during decompression events.

Implementation Method 1

coupled to the backside of the grille opening(s) to decrease the noise in the cabin and can release from the grille during a decompression event

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive bonding: Adhesive

Implementation Method 2

decompression panels or decompression grills that restrict such airflow in standard operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical barrier blocking:

Implementation Method 3

enable the airflow during a decompression event

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP3670324B1Decompression panel assembly and methods of assembling the same
Publication Date: 2021.12.08 THE BOEING CO
  • EP3670324B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3670324B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3670324B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A decompression panel assembly (106) for use in an aircraft includes a body panel (114) having an opening (116) defined therein and a cover panel (118) positioned within the opening and spaced from the body panel. The decompression panel assembly also includes an annular spacer panel (122) positioned outboard from the cover panel and the body panel. The spacer panel is spaced from the cover panel to define a first annular flow path (128) between the cover panel and the spacer panel, and the spacer panel is spaced from the body panel to define a second annular flow path (130) between the body panel and the spacer panel.