Decontamination Tank Multi-Chamber Poultry Treatment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current decontamination methods for poultry products are inadequate in removing pathogenic bacteria like Salmonella and E. coli from poultry carcasses, especially from hard-to-reach areas such as feather follicles and cavities, due to limitations in the distribution and concentration of antibacterial agents in chiller liquids, which can lead to residual contamination in the food supply.

Innovation Solution

A decontamination tank with multiple chambers and integrated liquid flow components that circulate antimicrobial solutions at high flow rates, allowing for sequential treatment with different antimicrobial agents and rinsing solutions, enhancing agitation and reducing the risk of agent interference or degradation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the concentration of antibacterial substances in the chiller liquid is increased to improve decontamination effectiveness, then bacterial reduction is enhanced, but organoleptic degradation of the product occurs (unacceptable changes in taste, aroma, appearance, or texture)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecontamination effectivenessVSAvoidorganoleptic degradation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The treatment process is divided into multiple sequential chambers, each containing different antibacterial agents at optimized concentrations. This segmentation allows each agent to work effectively without the negative effects of high concentrations of a single agent, maintaining product quality while achieving thorough decontamination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the treatment system by using multiple chambers with different antibacterial agents at different concentrations rather than a single chamber with high concentration. This parameter change allows effective decontamination while avoiding organoleptic degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Temperature

If the dwell time in the chiller tank is extended to reduce bird temperature, then chilling effectiveness is improved, but the concentration of antibacterial substances must be kept low to avoid product degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebird temperature reductionVSAvoidantibacterial effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The chilling and antibacterial treatment are segmented into separate functional chambers. The chiller chambers focus on temperature reduction while the antibacterial chambers apply concentrated antibacterial agents, allowing both functions to operate at optimal conditions without compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The antibacterial treatment is applied as a preliminary action before final product distribution. Multiple antibacterial chambers are positioned in the treatment sequence to ensure thorough decontamination occurs during the chilling process, eliminating the need for extended dwell times with high concentrations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If liquid application is intensified to remove bacteria from hard-to-reach areas (cavities and feather follicles), then decontamination coverage is improved, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecontamination coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The treatment system is segmented into multiple chambers that sequentially treat different aspects of decontamination. This segmentation allows comprehensive coverage of hard-to-reach areas through multiple exposure opportunities without requiring overly complex single-chamber systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The continuous flow through multiple chambers provides continuous antibacterial action throughout the treatment process. This continuous exposure in sequential chambers ensures thorough penetration into cavities and feather follicles without requiring complex agitation or injection systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The decontamination tank effectively reduces microbial contaminants on poultry products by providing aggressive agitation and controlled treatment with multiple antimicrobial agents, improving the removal of pathogens from hard-to-reach areas and ensuring safer food distribution.

Implementation Method 1

A liquid flow component can be integrated into the tank to circulate or pump an anti-microbial solution past the product

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForced convection: Forced Convection

Implementation Method 2

The decontamination tank effectively reduces microbial contaminants on poultry products by providing aggressive agitation and controlled treatment with multiple antimicrobial agents

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWashing:

Data Source

PatentUS20230165284A1Decontamination tank and method for treating food products
Publication Date: 2023.06.01 MORRIS & ASSOCIATES INC
  • US20230165284A1 patent drawing
  • US20230165284A1 patent drawing
  • US20230165284A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are various embodiments for a decontamination tank and method for treating reducing microbial contamination of a food product. In one embodiment, decontamination tank comprises a first chamber for holding a first antimicrobial bearing liquid for reducing a microbial contamination on a surface of the food product. The decontamination tank further comprises a second chamber for holding a second antimicrobial bearing liquid of different content than the first antimicrobial bearing liquid in the first chamber, for further reducing the microbial contamination on the surface of the food product. The decontamination tank further comprises a first unloader configured to remove the food product from the first antimicrobial bearing liquid in the first chamber and to deposit the food product toward the second chamber. The decontamination tank further comprises a second unloader configured to remove the food product from the second antimicrobial bearing liquid in the second chamber.