Decoupled Display Control for Flexible Processing Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing processing systems for creating stamp plates and other workpieces are inflexible, require high effort for single machining processes, and limit user interaction, as they often necessitate specialist personnel and are designed for specific tasks, restricting customer involvement and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A processing system with a decoupled operation that allows multiple display elements to input data simultaneously, enabling flexible use for various workpieces, automatic data transfer, and simplified handling, including a processing insert with multiple holding areas for different sizes and types of workpieces, allowing users to operate the system independently without specialist assistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a processing system is designed for a single machining process, then the device complexity is reduced, but the adaptability to different workpieces and tasks is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different workpiecesVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The processing system is designed to perform multiple machining tasks including engraving, cutting, and drilling through a single integrated device. The system can process various workpiece types (stamps, pendants, keys, USB sticks) using the same processing area and control unit, eliminating the need for multiple specialized devices while maintaining operational simplicity through standardized procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If specialist personnel operate the processing system, then the manufacturing precision is maintained, but the ease of operation is reduced due to specialized training requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidmanufacturing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables customers to independently create and process their own stamp designs without requiring specialist personnel. The intuitive interface allows users to input text, select fonts, and configure processing parameters directly, while the automated control system ensures consistent precision by executing standardized processing sequences and automatically positioning workpieces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit stores pre-configured processing parameters and procedures for different workpiece types and machining operations. This allows the system to automatically apply optimized settings without requiring user expertise, maintaining manufacturing precision while simplifying operation through automated parameter selection and process sequencing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If the processing system requires manual positioning of the beam source, then the ease of operation is reduced, but the adaptability to different processing positions is improved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidloss of time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical positioning of the beam source with an automated positioning system controlled by a control unit. The control unit receives digital position data and automatically moves the beam source to the required locations, eliminating time-consuming manual adjustment while maintaining the flexibility to process various workpiece geometries and positions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If the processing area is accessible during operation, then the ease of operation is improved, but the safety is reduced due to risk of injury

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The processing system incorporates a safety cover that segments the processing area from the user space. The cover can be opened or closed independently without affecting the overall system operation, allowing users to load or remove workpieces when the cover is open and providing automatic protection when closed. This segmented design maintains both safety and operational accessibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances user-friendliness, reduces the risk of injury, increases processing speed, and allows for a wide range of workpieces to be machined with a single device, enabling multiple users to input data concurrently and simplifying the operation, thus improving overall system flexibility and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The processing device, in particular a beam source of a laser

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser: Laser

Implementation Method 2

the processing device, in particular a beam source of a laser, is positioned manually and/or automatically. The specialist staff then starts the processing process so that a negative imprint of the stamp imprint created by the specialist staff on the computer is produced on the blank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser ablation: Laser Ablation

Data Source

PatentEP3080669B1Processing system and components therefor
Publication Date: 2019.06.12 TRODAT GMBH
  • EP3080669B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3080669B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3080669B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a processing system (1), comprising at least one processing region (3), a control region (4), and optionally a receiving region (5) and/or a presentation region (5), wherein a removable display element (11), on which operator software is installed, is arranged. Control software corresponding with the operator software, also called "Job Control" in the following, is integrated in the control region (4). By connecting the display element (11) to the processing system (1) or by activating via a button (12) on the display element (11), the processing system (1) is connected to said display element (11). Fig.